Anonymous ID: e5e588 Feb. 17, 2018, 9:21 a.m. No.409554   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9597

>>246069

>>246651

This is definitely the right approach - focusing on the facts and not explaining Q. Key facts/events should be sourced to the most objective sources possible.

 

As much as possible you have to eliminate reasonable doubt. Focus on key facts that are supported by objective (indisputable) proof to form the backbone. Reasonable doubt is eliminated by there being no other plausible explanation for a set of facts. (For example, I red-pilled my dad simply by sending him documentation of the sealed indictments and the relevant EOs and asked him what other explanation could be possible. He is now waiting for people to be arrested.)

 

I suggest working towards creating a simple straightforward fact sheet. Check out examples here - see links in the upper right hand corner. Each line item should be linked to the most objective source available. It could be called The Great Awakening - The Unwinding of the Deep State.

 

I would also suggest that nothing that's too difficult for a normie to digest is left out, as least for now. It's not necessary to sell them on the depths of the deception at this point - they just need to know that they've been deceived. Once that corner is turned, it will be much easier to add the more disturbing facts.

 

Anything that is not objectively sourced should be left out for now. If any drops happen that provide objective proof, then it gets added. But probably best to start with a digestible fact sheet that simply shows a concerted effort to work against the best interests of the American people for selfish gain. See if that gains traction and build from there.