Anonymous ID: 148ceb March 6, 2019, 6:05 a.m. No.5535882   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5893 >>5916 >>5924 >>5963 >>5969 >>6015 >>6160

I believe Q's willingness to malign the entire organization of Freemasonry is incredibly dangerous, ill-informed and speaks volumes of incompetence.

 

As a Master Mason, who joined Freemasonry with great skepticism and awareness of many of the conspiracies and such discussed here, I simply found no evidence of such evil and nefarious things going on inside of Freemasonry.

 

"You weren't high enough up", some will say. "They keep the secrets for the top Masons", some will say. Yet, if they are right, this still would not justify demonizing the MILLIONS of Americans who's curiosity led them to a Masonic-Lodge, and who have nothing but good intentions. I left the Lodge and haven't been back in about 2 years. My concern was that I felt like Kabbalah was being indirectly taught, which I found in conflict with my own Christian beliefs, as I found it to be a Jewish-teaching. And, I think I was correct in my first assertion, though I've recently come across some writings that suggest the Kabbalah is not "owned" by Judaism and may not be in conflict, but rather in harmony with my Christian beliefs. TBD…

 

Regardless, in my opinion, Q has revealed a flaw in his own logic, in this instance. And perhaps, revealed where his true allegiance lies. There is no justification for the blanket-demonization of Freemasonry, especially using little more than a few misinterpreted symbols.

 

FAIL Q… Epic FAIL.

Anonymous ID: 148ceb March 6, 2019, 6:21 a.m. No.5535997   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5535948

 

Is that right?

 

Well… I'll bet (You), that I have been here FAR longer than (You), and that I can prove it. (Just ask for a screenshot).

 

Did you even cbts or storm?

 

Don't try to sound experienced to the experienced. We only see you as incompetent, cupcake.

Anonymous ID: 148ceb March 6, 2019, 6:24 a.m. No.5536026   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6038

>>5535956

 

"You have to go back", is a phrase we used on various board to refer to migrants who refused to assimilate or demonstrate allegiance to this nation and therefore, "have to go back."

 

You think it means something that it doesn't…

 

Furthermore, what do you think my "game" here is?

 

If you think I said something untruthful, spit it out. And let's discuss. Otherwise, shut your vile-mouth, amateur.

Anonymous ID: 148ceb March 6, 2019, 6:26 a.m. No.5536057   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6161

>>5535976

 

Oh yeah… Because it's incredibly intelligent to NOT express your views and merely disagree JUST BECAUSE. Like (You)…

 

I cower before your awesome intellectual-prowess, highest-ranking anon.

Anonymous ID: 148ceb March 6, 2019, 6:31 a.m. No.5536091   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6106

>>5536038

 

Enlighten us then, since you seem to be the gatekeeper of all things Chan.

 

The phrase originated with Trump, regarding migrants… You simply don't know what you're talking about. And you've changed your tune, because POTUS changed his tune on migration.

 

For a sheep, you are terrible at, "Baaaaaaaaaa"ing.

Anonymous ID: 148ceb March 6, 2019, 6:41 a.m. No.5536206   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5536106

 

Sadly, I was not tame enough to be allowed to fight for country in any official-capacity. It only slightly offends me to be called "CIA" by you, as I feel the CIA doesn't always have the USA's best-interests at heart. Regardless, I'm going to fight for what is right, in the best way I know how, and there isn't a goddamn thing you can do to stop me…

 

What do you think about that, you who cannot even form a coherent-argument against my own?