> thinking for myself
< 30 posts
…reconcile.
thinking all by yourself would mean: 0 posts.
>coming in the next chapter of the story
how stupid is this?
Q doesn't make predictions, stop confusing newfags/normies.
this just feeds the "Q PREDICTED THIS" meme
cheers anon, glad to see ye around
>setting the table
Russia Collusion Projection = dying/dead.
on to another level of projection.
Sexual misconduct is the 'public shelter' to accept resignation.
Watch those announcing 2020 P running.
"You cannot attack a political opponent"
None are protected.
None are safe.
Q
THEY WANT THE KEYS TO THE KINGDOM.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-abigail-spanberger-cia-gop-20180829-story,amp.html📁
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2017/10/18/daily-202-ex-cia-officers-running-for-congress-as-democrats/59e6b25b30fb041a74e75de5/?utm_term=.fe9dbeb5b033📁
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/18/politics/intel-officers-running-against-trump-2018/index.html📁
[ACTIVE]
Q
>their objective is to attempt to establish themselves as the gatekeepers of the movement
that's what anons are for.
>This is a slide.
>You have no rights to anything on this board, nor does anyone else. You could have written a book, lifting what you wanted, but chose not to.
absolutely this.
the issue is not sourcing the content, it's the content selection & positioning as experts.
false equivalency/dilemma.
the sliding towards "muh research"/suing is obvious
Not at all, i've immediately sounded the alarm about the book being promoted, as others have.
Whining about "stolen" content is besides the point/not the issue.
Ridiculous.
Doing this to scare legit anons from publishing their own books.
This does not adress the actual issues of the QANON "experts" positioning book