Anonymous ID: 23b829 March 4, 2018, 8 p.m. No.553895   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>553866

 

Exec branch. There is no need for the Fed structure, or buildings for that matter, if it is "taken back." Printing and borrowing money was what the TD was created to do. The Fed act usurped that duty from the gov and gave it to private banks.

Anonymous ID: 23b829 March 4, 2018, 8:25 p.m. No.554053   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>554024

 

I have no idea what you are saying or why you are saying it to me.

 

I simply said the belief in FE predates written history. Why is that a problem for you?

 

I neither support the theory nor do I lecture those who believe it. You, OTOH, seem to be on a vendetta.

Anonymous ID: 23b829 March 4, 2018, 8:45 p.m. No.554160   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>554123

 

Thanks for the reply. No hard feelings.

 

TBH, I haven't thought much about it but I do not like it when people attack others for their beliefs. Seriously, it does not matter to me whether you believe the earth is flat or square. It just isn't important enough for me to care.

 

Would be interesting as hell if it was, though. People throughout history believed it. The first global maps seemed to indicate it. And I know this just from the study of history.

Anonymous ID: 23b829 March 4, 2018, 9:13 p.m. No.554329   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4367

>>554308

 

In terms of trading advantages in a global economy, yes. Of course, there are many other advantages to sovereign citizens, but the reality is we are in competition with the rest of the world, whether fiat money or gold-backed currency.

 

It should be interesting to all of us that the US went off gold at about the same time the current global economy began. Perhaps it was the first step in destroying the US.

Anonymous ID: 23b829 March 4, 2018, 9:27 p.m. No.554397   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4422 >>4429

>>554367

 

If we went to gold-backed currency, all exchange rates would have to be set against the price of gold. We can't have China and other low wage/no regulation economies toc ontinue to hold a currency advantage over us. Trump seems to have no problem attaching tariffs to countries who do not comply. It was one of Trump's campaign talking points.

Anonymous ID: 23b829 March 4, 2018, 9:44 p.m. No.554507   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>554487

 

The only thing I can figure is that he is nervous about them being considered public utilities of which he/deep state would lose control. If they are fractured, like Ma Bell was, then those conversations would stop.