dChan
Anonymous ID: 78f716 March 4, 2018, 7:49 p.m. No.553806   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>553067

>>553095

>>553118

>>553170

>>553380

 

thread for this

 

https:// 8ch.net/qresearch/res/553544.html

Anonymous ID: 78f716 March 4, 2018, 8 p.m. No.553893   🗄️.is 🔗kun

There are big issues with the body of what is in the current petition because it doesn't address the issues causing the matter completely.

 

For example, "Terms of Service" force you to give up your rights.

Anonymous ID: 78f716 March 4, 2018, 8:03 p.m. No.553912   🗄️.is 🔗kun

One important part here, so I must shout.

TERMS OF SERVICE ARE USED TO REMOVE YOUR RIGHTS

 

ASKING FOR MORE RIGHTS WITHOUT FIXING TERMS OF SERVICE LAWS MEANS NOTHING.

Anonymous ID: 78f716 March 4, 2018, 8:11 p.m. No.553959   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>553940

 

Stop shilling for net neutrality. Trump wanted to get rid of it for a reason. That reason was anti-trust laws were being interfered with.

Anonymous ID: 78f716 March 4, 2018, 8:43 p.m. No.554146   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4155 >>4161

Comments from the hive mind requested for this less shitty IBOR. (partial)

 

  1. Users of a public forum cannot have their rights presented here restricted by terms of use, service clauses or other contracts.

  2. Providers of a service may not discriminate against speech or expression except otherwise to provide for quality of service.

  3. Users of a public forum cannot be censored without notice, and an appeal process must be provided. (prevents shadow banning altogether)

Anonymous ID: 78f716 March 4, 2018, 9:19 p.m. No.554360   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Yet another revision, looking for feedback.

 

  1. These rights shall not be infringed. Users of a public forum cannot have their rights presented here restricted by terms of use, EULAs, service clauses or other contracts.

 

  1. Providers of a service may not discriminate against a user's speech or expression except otherwise to maintain quality of service. This does not cover commercial speech or political speech from a third party.

 

  1. Users of a public forum cannot be censored without notice, and an appeal process must be provided. (prevents shadow banning altogether)

 

  1. Providers of a public internet forum must allow users to opt out of personally identifiable information data collection.

Anonymous ID: 78f716 March 4, 2018, 9:30 p.m. No.554415   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4442 >>4456

Third revision. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

 

  1. These rights shall not be infringed. Users of a public forum cannot have their rights presented here restricted by terms of use, EULAs, service clauses or other contracts.

  2. Providers of a service may not discriminate against a user's speech or expression except otherwise to maintain quality of service. This does not cover commercial speech or political speech from a third party.

  3. Providers of a public internet forum may not apply foreign laws to American citizens.

  4. Users of a public forum cannot be censored without a public notice, and an appeal process must be provided.

  5. Providers of a public internet forum must allow users to opt out of personally identifiable information data collection.

Anonymous ID: 78f716 March 4, 2018, 9:37 p.m. No.554465   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>554442

 

You can't get rid of it completely, otherwise how would we ban the shills. Instead the bans have to be where people can see them.

 

Still needs a little bit to tie it down more though, I agree.