Regarding the #InternetBillOfRights below is from the AT&T link that Q provided yesterday. Having rights is better than just taking what someone decides you can have. Just like the Bill of Rights that is amended to our Constitution. The trick will be to write it correctly.
Also there is concern that Randall L Stephenson is on the CFR. I'm not a fan of the CFR since it is full of NWO shills but that doesn't mean we shouldn't demand the Internet Bill of Rights. We will also need a member of the House or Senate to introduce the bill into Congress.
>about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html
AT&T is committed to an open internet. We don’t block websites. We don’t censor online content. And we don’t throttle, discriminate, or degrade network performance based on content. Period.
We have publicly committed to these principles for over 10 years. And we will continue to abide by them in providing our customers the open internet experience they have come to expect.
But the commitment of one company is not enough. Congressional action is needed to establish an “Internet Bill of Rights” that applies to all internet companies and guarantees neutrality, transparency, openness, non-discrimination and privacy protection for all internet users.
From AT&T link:
Legislation would not only ensure consumers’ rights are protected, but it would provide consistent rules of the road for all internet companies across all websites, content, devices and applications. In the very near future, technological advances like self-driving cars, remote surgery and augmented reality will demand even greater performance from the internet. Without predictable rules for how the internet works, it will be difficult to meet the demands of these new technology advances.