Anonymous ID: 7e1551 March 6, 2019, 9:19 a.m. No.5538710   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5538609

Hard to disagree with that anons post. They lay it out and it's all verifiable. Checked. Especially after the "writer" made that video that was in the previous bread where he outright says he is keeping the money which blows their "going to charity" rhetoric away.

Anonymous ID: 7e1551 March 6, 2019, 9:20 a.m. No.5538729   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5538695

No reason to order a copy, anon said they would post it for free here over the next couple hours when they get home. Nobody should spend a dime on it when it will be free.

Anonymous ID: 7e1551 March 6, 2019, 9:21 a.m. No.5538762   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5538609

In the case you missed it, this is the guy claiming to represent the Q movement and who wrote it. To him we are shills or trolls for questioning this. Dude is total comped.

Anonymous ID: 7e1551 March 6, 2019, 9:26 a.m. No.5538846   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9031

>>5538821

Telling you guys, Kim is a bro. The guy probably has so much data that would expose so much. So come on Chairman Kim, come on over here, be an anon and tell us some stories!

Anonymous ID: 7e1551 March 6, 2019, 9:32 a.m. No.5538980   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Now this is interesting anons, very very interesting given this city has come up many times by our digs.

 

Kirstjen Nielsen was recently in Napa:

 

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/02/27/secretary-kirstjen-m-nielsen-trip-readout-napa-and-san-francisco-ca

Anonymous ID: 7e1551 March 6, 2019, 9:36 a.m. No.5539077   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9111

>>5538957

Justinformed Talk is fine by me since all he does is go over Q drops, report what they are and then report what anons uncover. He gives no opinions and he doesn't try to sell himself as some representative but just goes over the data, repeatedly shows his love of country and doesn't cause any issues and doesn't put himself out there as some expert.

 

Though I do not need to watch those videos since I am often right in the middle of the damn research I do sometimes like to see what is being said and he is the only one that I have seen that I have no issue with and most importantly he has had mspionage post and give him data now and again who goes way back to looking into these things since the 90s. Granted there may be more but I just don't look into that issue much since I consider YT to be controlled opposition or paytriots much of the time.

Anonymous ID: 7e1551 March 6, 2019, 9:38 a.m. No.5539108   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5539030

>They will get theirs

Given your writing style and pattern of statement, I am fairly sure you are one of the privchan members and I agree with you that they will given what I have been reading there. A mega exposure is going to clear them all out from looking at those things. If I am right and you are, thanks for the work done.

Anonymous ID: 7e1551 March 6, 2019, 9:46 a.m. No.5539261   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5539200

I don't follow, he (Nemos) goes into all the background of the issues? So what does he do, he just explains Qdrops and then reports what he thinks or what the anons are putting together? I do not know him/haven't watched his and don't need to watch any of those channels but I am just curious as to why they have popularity by people who are involved in looking at info themselves. Better stated, what exactly are they doing that makes them dependable when the real data is here?