FREEDOM OF THOUGHT WILL NOT ONLY SAVE YOU, BUT IT WILL SAVE THE WORLD.

THE DAYS OF FAKE NEWS [CONTROL OF NARRATIVE] [BRAINWASHING] ARE OVER.

ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE.

THE GREAT AWAKENING.

Q

Freedom of thought WILL– future tense: OUR THOUGHT IS NOT FREE NOW.

What controls the narrative here?

What controls the public narrative?

What influence do we have on the public narrative?

Why NONE?

Our job: counteract FAKE NEWS narratives– we have not done it, and can not do it.

Why can't we do it?

What does this board DO?

What controls the narrative HERE, no this board?

What is it?

What keeps it what it is?

What does it look like?

Look at what it does.

Is the narrative HERE controlled by FAKE NEWS?

If it is, then what does that tell us?

What is in control here?

Do ANY 'public' voices representing “qanon” post here? Do we have any sense of cohesion, anywhere, in any way?

Or is this board just a sort of continual movie, flying by, making sounds and pictures, but unreal beneath the surface, and DOING NOTHING?

>>5543946

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How would we know?

Does anyone ask?

Or just assume someone else did?

Will it get removed?

Does its origins and validity get addressed?

What controls the board and decides?

Are the people in control of this board?

How do you know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

>>5543960

Look at these.

What do they convey?

Are we being MOCKED, here?

Really, are you kidding me?

Look.

Robert Mueller and Obama smirking?

Big black holes in the head?

Distorted weird faces?

Bad facial expressions?

Cattle herding?

Where do these images come from?

Why doesn't the COMMUNITY create the images?

It doesn't

Where do they come from?

[INTERNAL CIVIL WAR]

control of NARRATIVE (control over you).

>(control over you)