Anonymous ID: 3017d5 March 6, 2019, 2:10 p.m. No.5543196   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3206 >>3282 >>3395

RR remarks at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton business school:

 

"This is one of my last significant events."

 

"The trajectory that we are on now – a culture in which some technology companies work to defeat legitimate law enforcement activities – will not end well. Protecting honest people from being harmed by criminals is a worthy endeavor, but protecting criminals from being caught imposes a heavy cost."

 

"Today, you are relentlessly bombarded with information, much of it of unknown reliability. The internet lets people share their most ignorant thoughts. Many news stories rely on anonymous sources, without providing details to assess their credibility and bias. Some critics worry that our society will be unable to distinguish fact from opinion, and truth from fiction."

 

"But members of your generation take a different approach. You do not rely on any one news source. You recognize that some people who appear regularly on television – the ones who always form an opinion before they know the facts – those characters are in the entertainment business. Because you understand that, you are more skeptical, and less gullible."

 

"Complacency can be deadly. Taleb tells a story that illustrates the danger of forgetting that past performance is never a reliable indicator of future outcomes: “Consider a turkey that is fed every day. Every … feeding [strengthens] the bird’s [confidence] that it is the general rule of life [that humans always] ‘look… out for its best interests’ …. On the … [day] before Thanksgiving, something unexpected will happen to the turkey.” Taleb refers to that as a “Black Swan” event – a occurrence so low in probability that we ignore the risk, but so great in impact that it renders projections meaningless."

 

"My time as a law enforcement official is coming to an end, a lot later than I expected. People joke about the revolving door between government and the private sector. The door never revolved for me. It was one way in, and one way out."

 

"When you study anyone’s career, there usually appears to be an obvious logic to their path. Each person was in the right place, at the right time, to take advantage of the next opportunity. But that appearance of logic is always wrong. It is a product of hindsight bias, the tendency to see a pattern in retrospect that never exists in real time."

 

"The truth is that everyone’s life is a product of random events and consequential decisions. The random events are things that happen to you, beyond your control. The consequential decisions are what you choose to do in response."

 

(((This sounds like farewell with confession)))

 

(((He flipped 100%)))

Anonymous ID: 3017d5 March 6, 2019, 2:24 p.m. No.5543427   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3476 >>3866

This little-known Mueller report is required to be given to Congress — and it will likely be ‘on a fast track’ to be made public

 

According to U.S. Justice Department regulations, there is another report that must be made when Special Counsel Robert Mueller delivers the final report for his Russia investigation: the attorney general of the United States must give Congress a report listing every time Mueller’s supervisors declined one of his requests. And Politico reporters Darren Samuelsohn and Andrew Desiderio examine the possible implications of this requirement in a March 6 article for Politico.

 

“No matter what the memo says, it’s expected to be one of the few items on a fast track for being made public that will be closely scrutinized for insights into the inner workings of the special counsel’s tight-lipped investigation,” Politico reports.

 

Mueller has been incredibly tight-lipped about his Russia probe, carefully avoiding the media. And it not only remains to be seen what will be in Mueller’s final report—it remains to be seen what will be in the report that Attorney General William Barr must give Congress.

 

In their Politico piece, titled “The Mueller Report No One Is Talking About,” Samuelsohn and Desiderio note that Barr’s report to Congress “could very well end up being blank”—which would serve as “tangible proof that the special counsel was allowed to carry out his investigation without interference.”

 

But on the other hand, Samuelsohn and Desiderio write, things could be much different if Barr’s report to Congress contains any “explosive revelations detailing instances in which Mueller clashed with his department supervisors—say, over a subpoena for the president or an indictment against a top Trump aide or family member.”

 

According to Samuelsohn and Desiderio, any such revelations could “open a road map for Democratic lawmakers who have already begun their own investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 elections, as well as the president’s conduct since taking office.”

 

Sol Wisenberg, who served as a deputy on Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr’s investigation of President Bill Clinton in the 1990s, told Politico that whatever Barr’s report to Congress reveals, it could be “significant.”

 

Wisenberg told Politico that in one scenario, President Donald Trump would “be able to say” that Mueller “wasn’t kept at all from going anywhere he wanted to go…. On the other hand, if he was kept from going somewhere, that’s a big deal too. The Democrats will make a big deal about that. I think it’s important either way.”

 

Samuelsohn and Desiderio point out that although Mueller has “not been subject to daily supervision” since being chosen for the Russia probe in May 2017, he “hasn’t had total freedom either” and has reported to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, then Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, and now, William Barr. Mueller didn’t report to former Attorney General Jeff Sessions because Sessions recused himself from the Russia investigation—much to Trump’s consternation.

 

Matthew Axelrod, who was a senior official for the Justice Department under President Barack Obama, told Politico, “If you know that on the back end, you’re going to have to justify yourself to Congress, it has a good deterrent effect of preventing anyone from maybe squashing something the special counsel wanted to do.”

 

Axelrod described Barr’s required report to Congress as “the tail of what is likely to be a very significant and large dog.” Axelrod told Politico what while Barr’s report is “something of interest,” it is “dwarfed in comparison and size to what’s in the actual meat of the report itself.”

 

https://www.alternet.org/2019/03/this-little-known-mueller-report-is-required-to-be-given-to-congress-and-it-will-likely-be-on-a-fast-track-to-be-made-public/

Anonymous ID: 3017d5 March 6, 2019, 2:28 p.m. No.5543476   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5543427

 

§ 600.9 Notification and reports by the Attorney General.

 

(a) The Attorney General will notify the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Judiciary Committees of each House of Congress, with an explanation for each action -

 

(1) Upon appointing a Special Counsel;

 

(2) Upon removing any Special Counsel; and

 

(3) Upon conclusion of the Special Counsels investigation, including, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.

 

(b) The notification requirement in paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be tolled by the Attorney General upon a finding that legitimate investigative or privacy concerns require confidentiality. At such time as confidentiality is no longer needed, the notification will be provided.

 

(c) The Attorney General may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions. All other releases of information by any Department of Justice employee, including the Special Counsel and staff, concerning matters handled by Special Counsels shall be governed by the generally applicable Departmental guidelines concerning public comment with respect to any criminal investigation, and relevant law.

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/600.9

Anonymous ID: 3017d5 March 6, 2019, 2:34 p.m. No.5543574   🗄️.is 🔗kun

AntiShill prayer

 

I think logically and come to this board for a purpose.

 

I want to read the work other real anons are doing and help with that work.

 

To that end I will not be lured into pointless flame wars and will not be tempted by clickbait YouTube links.

 

I will ignore the crap conspiracy posts — no matter the subject — and pass by any posts critical of Q. Q no longer needs proof so any crap to the contrary is just that: crap. Not worthy of a logically thinking anon. I will also ignore any posts based on faulty logic— because stupid is stupid no matter what the motivation.

 

Shills will continue to shill and clowns/idiots/nut jobs will insist on posting their crap. Please do so, because every minute you spend in a futile attempt to sway real patriots from their beliefs and ideals is a minute you are not doing something worse out in the real world. Just know you are totally wasting your time, but please keep wasting it. Please!!!!

 

Real anons think logically and will not be turned from the light.

Anonymous ID: 3017d5 March 6, 2019, 2:38 p.m. No.5543650   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3718 >>3825

Lawmakers to DoD: You knew about water contamination. Why haven’t you done more?

 

The Pentagon’s decision not to take action to protect military families from decades of exposure to cancer-causing chemicals until a 2016 Environmental Protection Agency warning did not sit well with members of Congress, who questioned Defense Department leadership on the issue at a hearing Wednesday.

 

“To put it charitably: it is unclear why DoD feels justified in passing the buck to the EPA," said House Oversight and Reform subcommittee on the environment chairman Rep. Harley Rouda, D-Calif. “Particularly in light of evidence suggesting DoD’s awareness of the toxicity of the chemicals since the early 1980s.”

 

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2019/03/06/lawmakers-to-dod-you-knew-about-water-contamination-why-havent-you-done-more/

Anonymous ID: 3017d5 March 6, 2019, 2:41 p.m. No.5543692   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3704

>>5543673

 

The matrix is real. Even Q hints at it. The matrix is layers. You have been conditioned to think of death as an end versus as a state. You have been conditioned to think you are your body. Your focus is constantly redirected to your body via entertainments, desires, needs, envies, fears, etc. You have been conditioned to think YOLO, the here and the now, carpe diem, live in the moment. You have been conditioned you exist here not there or behind you. You have been conditioned what you can see, touch, feel, taste, hear is real. It is 99% empty space with 1% of molecules vibrating within a range of "everything" that it appears solid, tangible…real.

 

You are dead. Your brain is not the source of your consciousness. Your brain is only the medium in which your consciousness is operating through in this layer. We are developing this technology here in this layer. Digital uploading of ones memories. Its already happened. Nothing is new under the sun. You have already been uploaded or should I say downloaded. You are dead.

 

To help explain: In this layer imagine downloading your subconscious and memories into a digital platform.. dying..being cloned and re uploaded. Where are you? You are in the hole in the ground they put you, you are dead but do not know it.

 

This is the reality of your situation. You are dead. YOU are NOT HERE! You are a prisoner.

 

There is one escape and your "time" to find is limited. The TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE.

Anonymous ID: 3017d5 March 6, 2019, 2:54 p.m. No.5543897   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5543866

 

§ 600.9 Notification and reports by the Attorney General.

 

(a) The Attorney General will notify the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Judiciary Committees of each House of Congress, with an explanation for each action -

 

(1) Upon appointing a Special Counsel;

 

(2) Upon removing any Special Counsel; and

 

(3) Upon conclusion of the Special Counsels investigation, including, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.

 

(b) The notification requirement in paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be tolled by the Attorney General upon a finding that legitimate investigative or privacy concerns require confidentiality. At such time as confidentiality is no longer needed, the notification will be provided.

 

(c) The Attorney General may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions. All other releases of information by any Department of Justice employee, including the Special Counsel and staff, concerning matters handled by Special Counsels shall be governed by the generally applicable Departmental guidelines concerning public comment with respect to any criminal investigation, and relevant law.

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/600.9