Who is behind the Roths? I've been asking myself that question for a while. The links drawn in the post seem valid. But it does seem like there must be some person(s) who are connecting all the lines to this incredibly intricate cabal. Is there one Roth who is doing this? The antichrist? The high witch of the Illuminati? Etc?
A prime example of media bias and censorship. The media has blamed Pamela Geller for standing against the ISIS killing of Charlie Hebdo journalists and banned her from their platforms.
Now they are seeking to punish her via outing her daughters, who are now being banned from their successful social media platforms.
This despite of the Fatwa on Geller which could endanger her children by making their identities publicly known.
Sounds like Geller and her children would be prime candidates for joining in a class action suit.
http:// www. breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/04/caroline-glick-taylor-lorenz-the-daily-beast-and-the-evil-media-vs-pamela-geller/>>>>/qresearch2gen/2403
I don't know. Not saying it couldn't be, but it seems to me to be more plausible that if Soros would be taking orders from P who takes orders from Roths, P would not be a computer.
I think Pope could make sense in that the Roths handle the Vatican finances.
Le Cercle could also make sense, a cabal of people who tell Soros what to do. Or maybe the Pilgrim society.
But in any case, I don't get the impression that P is the one who is at the top, above the Roths.
I do feel that there is someone(s) pulling the strings at the top. Just don't know who.
.>>555003
Supposed to be a sign of participating in a satanic ritual of some sort.
Was discussed in detail many weeks back.
Relatively few people who believe the Bible believe that it teaches that the earth is flat. Most who believe in the Bible do believe that God created earth but many believe that He did so through the big bang so that is not a belief that is exclusive to luciferians.
Some people believe that God created via evolution. So don't draw the lines so narrowly. This is not an issue of Bible or godlessness, whether the earth is flat or round.
The young-earth creationists have boxed themselves into a corner by insisting that this is the only way the Bible can be interpreted, and by doing so have alienated many from even considering a belief in the God of the Bible.
See reasons.org.
I suggest that you focus on the task at hand here on this board and recognize that belief in a flat earth is not an essential to the faith or to the Q mission.
Sumerian texts and others have some elements in common with biblical accounts, possibly attesting to an earlier oral tradition that diverged before being committed to writing.
However, biblical account is much more literal, and is monotheistic while Sumerian is much more mythological and fanciful.