A billion autonomous biological computational device form an evolutionary inflection point when the quality and speed of the network connecting them become such that it is no longer a network but becomes a parallel computational entity of unimaginable power.
If the data circulating to the autonomous biological processors was “true” or error corrected as is done at every other stage of life and in computer science; the performance would be enhanced by orders of magnitude.
Many people assume that technology is in some way artificial. It is as natural as a bird’s nest, a part of the same developmental process that governs the entirety of nature. Social evolution and biological evolution are natural processes, and as with a seed, the full life as individuals and as a species is contained in their beginning.
Human beings have two identities, the smaller, individual identity is comprised of our life experience, information inputs and personal history. The second, much greater, identity is collective. We all participate in that identity, and because we’ve been asleep, so has that identity be dormant within us.
No individual can create anything of value without drawing on the work of others. Word, numbers and tools are the works of countless human being. Every patent filed rest on the shoulder of work done by previous generations. Pythagoras depended on his olive grower, who depended in turn on his meanest slave to irrigate the olive grove. Every human being who has ever lived contributed in some way to civilization. Doesn't matter if we sweep streets or do physics every one contributes to and participates the achievement of the whole. The achievement of each means each is to participate in the coming-to-consciousness of the whole, the greater self.
The mystics called this entity Adam Kadmon, the cosmic man. Mathematical physicist like Klee Irwin and the Q gravity group use geometrical expressions to describe the same phenomena, computational biologist another and depth psychologists and occultists yet another set of terms symbols and images. Every rational perspective describes the same phenomena using a distinct nomenclature, images and symbols, and none are wrong. It is impossible say that any one description is “truer” than another. CF Quine, Indeterminacy of radical translation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indeterminacy_of_translation