VOX publishes lurid hit piece on new Q book: time to call them out on their attack journalism!

Here is the VOX headline:

''How a conspiracy theory about Democrats drinking children’s blood topped Amazon’s best-sellers list: The algorithm rewards quick purchases and fervent reviews — not quality content''

by Kaitlyn Tiffany 3-6-19

This is yellow journalist at its basest.

Its purpose is not to report, only to attack. The object is to shut down Q group and others like it by making Q community look ridiculous–really, like total LUNATICS–in the eyes of the public. This is not okay.

To that end, below is a list of VOX articles and their authors. Anons are invited to DIGG on both VOX and these authors to find out exactly who and what are behind these attacks.

Excerpt from today's article:

The conspiracy theory QAnon — which started on 4chan in the fall of 2017, then bubbled up across Reddit, YouTube, Twitter, and the celebrity sphere — is now topping some of Amazon’s best-sellers lists, NBC News reported Monday.

QAnon followers claim to believe, among other things, that Hillary Clinton is the leader of a Satanic cabal that feeds on the blood of children and profits off sex trafficking, and that special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the 2016 election is actually a ruse designed to cover up his close friendship and partnership with Donald Trump. The two are supposedly working together to take Clinton down and her various demonic helpers.

The book QAnon: An Invitation to the Great Awakening was supposedly written by 12 anonymous members of the group promoting the theory, and presents their ideas in what one customer review calls “a gentle way for uninformed ‘normies’ to find out what is really going on within the political class that have been ruling over us for decades.” The book has been listed on Amazon since February 26, and climbed the Amazon charts astoundingly quickly thanks to concerted efforts by conspiracy theorists to rack up positive reviews.

………..

https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2019/3/6/18253505/amazon-qanon-book-best-seller-algorvoc.cothm-conspiracy

—————–

VOX'S track record on Q

VOX has a particular bad record when it comes to their Q coverage. Their articles are not only anti-Q but deliberately inflammatory:

Jane Coaston:

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/8/1/17253444/qanon-trump-conspir 2018-08-02

[Says Q group is the "scarily popular [and]…pro-Trump”]

https://www.vox.com/technology/2018/12/12/18136132/google-youtube-congress-conspiracy-theories 2018-12-14

[Focus on Pichai testimony and Frazzledrip]

https://www.vox.com/2018/12/31/18144710/conspiracy-theories-trump-2018-qanon-soros-false-flags, 2018-12-31

[Starts with the Hoover Dam story and goes downhill from there…]

Alvin Chang:

https://www.vox.com/2018/8/8/17657800/qanon-reddit-conspiracy-data 2018-08-08

“We analyzed every Qanon post on Reddit. Here’s who QAnon supporters actually are”

[You'll hardly recognize yourselves, anons….]

German Lopez:

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/12/5/13842258/pizzagate-comet-ping-pong-fake-news 2018-12-05

[Starts with story of Pizzagate shooter & goes downhill from there…]

Kaitlyn Tiffany:

https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2019/3/6/18253505/amazon-qanon-book-best-seller-algorithm-conspiracy 3-6-19

[Today's article; see CAPP]

>>5546578

A suggestion, anon. Like you, I like posting intricate material. Which many people will not read. Have you thought of summarizing the key points in a much shorter piece? That would get people interested in the first place. (It's not easy, I know, but worth a try?)

>>5546587

You miss my point entirely, anon. These journalists attack up for ANYTHING, even the best and highest work we have to offer. They trash it all, every bit. They must be called to account for their arrogance and complete lack of professionality.

Now: you raise another issue, which I would be happy to talk about. But it is a different issue from the one I am raising.

>>5546554

Please note: This article is about the MSM attacking the new Q book, not about the new Q book itself. Two separate issues worthy of independent discussions.

>>5546821

As in, there's no such thing as bad advertising? That s a good point, It's like the MSM constantly calling out POTUS for spelling mistakes in Twatter.

But that doesn't stop POTUS from going after the MSM and calls them out every chance he gets, because they need to be exposed for what they are: the Newspeak troops of the NWO.

>>5546801

Things don't just implode on their own. When we see something that is wrong and have the ability to successfully challenge that wrong, why not do that? I will do it every chance I get, nailing them with their own petard–publicizing their lies and those who put them out.

WE ARE Q.

Every one of us.

WWG1WGA.