Anonymous ID: 40cde1 March 6, 2019, 6:04 p.m. No.5547431   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7456

''re-post; anons, this is not about the new Q book it's about the

MSM attack on Q''

 

VOX publishes lurid hit piece on new Q book: time to call them out NOW!

 

Here is the VOX headline:

''How a conspiracy theory about Democrats drinking children’s blood topped Amazon’s best-sellers list: The algorithm rewards quick purchases and fervent reviews — not quality content''

by Kaitlyn Tiffany 3-6-19

 

This is yellow journalist at its basest.

Its purpose is not to report, only to attack. The object is to shut down Q group and others like it by making Q community look ridiculous–really, like total LUNATICS–in the eyes of the public. This is not okay. To that end, below is a list of part articles and their authors published by VOX. Anons are invited to research both VOX and these authors to find out what and who are behind these attacks.

 

Excerpt from today's article:

The conspiracy theory QAnon — which started on 4chan in the fall of 2017, then bubbled up across Reddit, YouTube, Twitter, and the celebrity sphere — is now topping some of Amazon’s best-sellers lists, NBC News reported Monday.

 

QAnon followers claim to believe, among other things, that Hillary Clinton is the leader of a Satanic cabal that feeds on the blood of children and profits off sex trafficking, and that special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the 2016 election is actually a ruse designed to cover up his close friendship and partnership with Donald Trump. The two are supposedly working together to take Clinton down and her various demonic helpers.

 

The book QAnon: An Invitation to the Great Awakening was supposedly written by 12 anonymous members of the group promoting the theory, and presents their ideas in what one customer review calls “a gentle way for uninformed ‘normies’ to find out what is really going on within the political class that have been ruling over us for decades.” The book has been listed on Amazon since February 26, and climbed the Amazon charts astoundingly quickly thanks to concerted efforts by conspiracy theorists to rack up positive reviews.

………..

https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2019/3/6/18253505/amazon-qanon-book-best-seller-algorvoc.cothm-conspiracy

—————–

 

VOX'S track record on Q

VOX has a particular bad record when it comes to their Q coverage. Their articles are not only anti-Q but deliberately inflammatory:

 

Jane Coaston:

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/8/1/17253444/qanon-trump-conspir 2018-08-02

[Says Q group is the "scarily popular [and]…pro-Trump”]

 

https://www.vox.com/technology/2018/12/12/18136132/google-youtube-congress-conspiracy-theories 2018-12-14

[Focus on Pichai testimony and Frazzledrip]

 

https://www.vox.com/2018/12/31/18144710/conspiracy-theories-trump-2018-qanon-soros-false-flags, 2018-12-31

[Starts with the Hoover Dam story and goes downhill from there…]

 

Alvin Chang:

https://www.vox.com/2018/8/8/17657800/qanon-reddit-conspiracy-data 2018-08-08

“We analyzed every Qanon post on Reddit. Here’s who QAnon supporters actually are”

[You'll hardly recognize yourselves, anons….]

 

German Lopez:

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/12/5/13842258/pizzagate-comet-ping-pong-fake-news 2018-12-05

[Starts with story of Pizzagate shooter & goes downhill from there…]

 

Kaitlyn Tiffany:

https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2019/3/6/18253505/amazon-qanon-book-best-seller-algorithm-conspiracy 3-6-19

[Today's article; see CAPP]

Anonymous ID: 40cde1 March 6, 2019, 6:05 p.m. No.5547456   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7473

>>5547431

An anon's plea: Do not let the new Q books divide up the Q community

 

The MSM is attacking Q community on an unprecedented level. And not just using the usual lurid stories, linking us with Pizzagate or frazzledrip, or "loaded" language to ridicule our values as intolerant, racist or Nazi. Bigger guns are coming into play–like the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, which has ties to the international Deep State in Europe and beyond. The recently released report on the effect on online social media Bavarian elections by Institute for Strategic Dialogue targeted Q group as a negative influence. The funder? Soros' Open Society Foundations. Plz see >>5497591 pb Soros-sponsored report: Q movement promoted anti-democratic ideas in bavarian elections.

 

This places our community directly in the crosshairs of Deep State. So it is very important at a time like this to strengthen our community, so that we cannot be divided by the MSM, shills or even just disgruntled anons with an ax to grind.

 

Now there are two books out on Amazon about Q, one very short (< 50 pages) and another longer compilation about various Q topics put together by a group of individuals most of whom have social media sites that promote Q.

 

Anons have various reactions to these new books, especially the second, because it seems to suggest that these authors are "authorities" on Q. We all know that NOBODY is an authority on Q and no anon in the genuine service of Q would is likely to make such a claim. But such language is common in marketing literature, and people who lack refined writing skills may lack the finesse to come up with something better.

 

There is another factor. Beyond the world of this 8chan board are a large number of Q enthusiasts who get most of their "Q news" via intermediaries, not directly from 8chan. Judging from the book reviews of the longer book–which are EXTREMELY positive–many people in this larger community are thrilled about the word on Q getting out via these books. I think many would have a hard time understanding the reservations anons may have about the motives of the writers.

 

My perspective: Many books will be published on Q in the future. They will vary greatly in accuracy and quality. Do not let this new development split our community into anons vs non-anons (or in any other way). If you don't like what someone is doing or saying, TELL THEM! Challenge them directly. Don't just complain on the board.

 

OUR GREATEST STRENGTH, ANONS. Can we by-pass some differences in order to remain one community, even one with some strong differences of opinion? A strong community DEBATES its differences. Let's do the same. I welcome your responses.