Anonymous ID: 54ba1c March 6, 2019, 8:29 p.m. No.5549984   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5549880

Agree with you, personally.

But if one things is true, then that for Q it'd be easy to confirm/dismiss it. I myself, as a clockfag privately, would not care if the current model/hypothesis of the clock is right or wrong. I'd just think again and try the next most likely model/idea.

Instead Q observes what's going on and the amount of shilling, all while I know that the original clockfags are genuine and honest, and far from shills.

So there must be a reason, evidently, Q never comment on the clock …

Anonymous ID: 54ba1c March 6, 2019, 8:41 p.m. No.5550236   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5550175

What's with Microsoft Q?

I hear Twitter, Facebook, Google all the time.

What about "office 365"?

What about "data harvesting" through all the information their "OS" (and it's a virus actually) does?

'Lifelog' much?