>>5550175 pb The problem is that people have to care. Some older people care about privacy but there are generations who have been conditioned to not care/believe it has no value. How can we go back? The entire digital economy is built on private companies tracking people. The average person thinks that companies are tracking everything they do, why would they care or think differently if it came out publicly that the companies are just the government in disguise? All this seems like too little to late. The hearts and minds of generations look to be lost. Maybe it is different other places, but the big cities will say 'so what' to what Q is telling us/confirming too many of us already knew and have no power to stop.

The irony is that this communication tool that has not been available for a before and Q is using, rides on top of a system that is built to track us. I want there to be different way, but taking out FB, Amazon, Microsoft, etc., I'm not sure how that fixes anything.

>>5550786 pb China not letting FB in just says they don't want competition. They have just as much surveillance, they just are out in the open about it. So we bring it into the open, like China, what are/can people do about it? Disconnect from the internet? We have real ID in almost every state, cameras everywhere, private companies beyond the big name tech firms gathering every scrap of data they can get their hands on. Is that market going to collapse because it is brought to light? Seems unlikely people will start paying for the convenience of the internet. Pandora's box is open, what is the solution to turn this around? (And if you say VPN, you are more ill informed than you think you are).