Anonymous ID: acc7f9 March 6, 2019, 9:45 p.m. No.5551802   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1840 >>1983

>>5551711 (LB)

Inclusion of RIM is interesting.

It was remarkable how quickly RIM/BlackBerry fell. Like someone just flipped a switch and <poofgone.

Public story was that it was because they weren't agile enough to counter the rise of touch screens, but it always felt like more than that.

Add to that the fact of two high-profile [D]s (HRC/HUSSEIN) being tied to them.

Anonymous ID: acc7f9 March 6, 2019, 10:03 p.m. No.5552200   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2361

>>5552160

I agree entirely. But if we question why it needs to be done, we are "questioning progress".

Same thing with the self-driving cars (or even some of the tech already in them – like remote starting capability.)

Anonymous ID: acc7f9 March 6, 2019, 10:07 p.m. No.5552268   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5552206

The huge push this past Xmas for the various spy tech as a great gift idea! Amazon Alexa etc.

Felt like I had to ask spouseanon to tell the in-laws that I did not want anything like that for Xmas. (what do we get anon-in-law for Xmas? I know!!)