>It's all making so much sense now.
Learn as much as you can and wake others up. This is how we win.
>Just got a liberal to admit
Just out of curiosity, you might challenge them to find Trump saying something in a video that demonstrates that he's a bad guy. I've been curious for a while if anyone can find a clip that is bad. I haven't found it and I've looked extensively.
>US companies should be prosecuted for global treachery
I think this is the point of Q. Time will tell.
Nice touch with Rosenstein.
Thx - watching
Not all opinions are only based on feelings. You don't know who you're talking to.
Think Ethernet interface chips. If they have the Ethernet chip, they have the device. They can communicate through devices without the devices even being aware that it is happening.
Anything with DMA access to RAM is highly suspect. Anything with a complex architecture likely has a hidden core in it that responds to very unlikely patterns and can do unbelievably scary shit.
>A lot of it is hardware level backdoors. Going to need to stop it at the manufacturing level as well.
Yes, although there's a transition period coming. It is quite possible (and actually easy) to design systems with compromised chips that severely limit the usefulness of hardware exploits. For example, using separate CPUs for edge communication and peripherals vs. an internal CPU (or CPUs) for secure things. This can be done, but somehow you never see any mainstream computers designed this way. Fancy that. It is coming…
>& fuck knows what else.
Don't forget that the FB application (and associated drivers) turn your phone into a privately controlled surveillance device which would be a wet dream to the IC only 15 years ago.