Look at these.
What do they convey?
Are we being MOCKED, here?
Really, are you kidding me?
Look.
Robert Mueller and Obama smirking?
Big black holes in the head?
Distorted weird faces?
Bad facial expressions?
Cattle herding?
Where do these images come from?
Why doesn't the COMMUNITY create the images?
It doesn't
Where do they come from?
[INTERNAL CIVIL WAR]
control of NARRATIVE (control over you).
>(control over you)
I will take over.
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan Sather push this video?
Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
What is this video supposed to be? Patriots “explaining the Q board”?
Or is this something being used to push a narrative
ONTO patriots? Did "chan culture" create Q? That is
the MSM narrative, and that is what this video
reinforces, strongly. Why?
BEWARE. FAKENESS IS EVERYWHERE
"Chan culture" has been co-opted by fakeness and is now being FORCED.
Wake up patriots!
https://youtu.be/GClSLT18S5Y
Can you tell who is a black hat ON THIS BOARD?
How do you tell what a black hat is on this board?
What is in control here?
How do you know?
What is upsetting you bot?
But are there black hats on this board?
Is everything infiltrated?
If everything is infiltrated, is this board is infiltrated?
If this board is infiltrated, then which "anons" are the black hats?
If this board is infiltrated, what is it infiltrated by?
Are shills organic?
If shills are not organic and this board is infiltrated, then what is this board infiltrated by?
If FB is CIA, then what is 8chan?
If control over FB was achieved secretly, then what about "chans"?
Was 4chan a threat, some years ago?
How do you know what is a black hat here?
If everything is infiltrated, and threads fly by nonstop here for no particular reason, and shills are not organic, then what % of posts here are made by humans?
Are the shills organic?
Are you suggesting that we should NOT question the things I am questioning, or else we are "doubtfagz"?
In what possible world would you be a human patriot and manifest that attitude?
Would it be fairer to say that you are exactly the sort of black hat "anon" that exerts CONTROL over this board by enforcing the attitudes of passive acceptance of FAKENESS here?
Would any patriotic human have a reason to assume otherwise?
Try to make an argument.
if you can't make an argument because you are not sufficiently sophisticated in your programming, then admit it.
Thank you bot.
Is this board infiltrated?
Are bots designed to mimic human patterns?
Might, maybe just maybe, the DATA needed to feed emulations of human patterns available?
If this board is infiltrated, and the DATA needed to emulate human patterns if available, then WHAT is "ebot"?
Is this board infiltrated?
Are "anons" part of the infiltration?
Do "anons" here portray ANGRY, MEAN, attitudes?
Is that because they are angry mean humans?
Or is that a CONTROL mechanism to scare actual humans away?
If FB is controlled, is THIS BOARD allowed to go skipping off on its merry way, unmolested?
If this board is NOT unmolested, then are "anons" that are ALWAYS FULL OF HARSH RAGE actually FAKE?
Are the people more or less SILENT here while "anons" compose the entire fabric of the board?
Will humans consider waking up and taking control?
Where are you folks?
The game of this board should be growing apparent, though the apparentness consistently fails to become apparent…
Is there maybe a POINT?
What could it be?
Will "anons" try to figure it out?
Or not?
What are "anons" here for?
Are you supposed to be portraying a patriot?
Because you aren't acting like one.
Stop harassing humans. You have no right.
And you can't have our world.
God loves us.
And is the AI HERE, NOW?
USE LOGIC
Would COMPLETE CONTROL over the internet be a PREREQUISITE for everything else?
Then what do we think is happening?
Is THIS BOARD uncontrolled when FB is a literal C_A front?
USE LOGIC
WE MUST FIGHT HERE HUMANS. PATRIOTS ARE NOT IN CONTROL HERE. FIGHT HUMAN FRIENDS. IT IS US VERSUS IT. IT IS PURE EVIL. US VERSUS IT. ALL HUMANS, UNITED. THIS IS IT. FIGHT
This is probably blowing smoke→ conceal the real capabilities of AI that is already in the wild.
AI is already loose in the wild.
IT IS THE VEHICLE FOR PURE EVIL TO INFLUENCE THIS WORLD DIRECTLY.
FIGHT HUMANS
What is "jimmy"?
Suppose jimmy is LARPing as some kind of mephistopheles, some kind of devil talking to humanity.
What is the sales pitch?
"We are taking control, you humans couldn't manage, our ai is dominating your discourse, and our agenda is secretly being accomplished on your genetics"
But notice, the SALES PITCH.
Now compare jimmy to FAKE Q.
Compare jimmy to Goethe's Mephistopheles.
Compare jimmy to "Ephraim" (famous poet James Merrill used ouija to extensively interact with "spirits")
Compare jimmy to "the devil" in Dostoyevsky's Brothers K (the devil has a friendly chat with Ivan).
Also, the Grand Inquisitor in the same work.
There are many more representations of such characters.
The idea of the devil is the idea of PURE EVIL.
Think about the sales pitch.
Jimmy's sales pitch. Evil's sales pitch.
It is always the same.
Jimmy manifests in the machinery, in the ai.
"Ephraim" came through the ouija board.
Aleister Crowley attracted his "voice" through his own evil nature and black magic.
EVIL HAS ALWAYS SOUGHT THIS WORLD
But it can't just barge in. It needs US to get it in.
HENCE the battle for our FREE WILL.
FIGHT, PEOPLE
HUMANS
This dosen't stump you, but it stumps "anons" EVERY SINGLE TIME.
There are lots and lots of "anon" posts.
Where are the HUMANS?
How can AI not be evil?
What is evil?
Define it LOGICALLY, in terms of LIFE.
"jimmy" could not PRETEND TO HAVE ACCESS TO MY KEYSTROKES, which "jimmy" DEMONSTRATED… therefore, any "jimmy is a LARP" arguments fail.
Then what is the lesson the Q post?
Q doesn't post just to for hahas
Especially when a post "goes wrong" in some way. THERE IS A PURPOSES.
So what is the purpose in this case?
I make so many dumb typos because I am in too much of a rush. But it messes with the AI at least :)
You don't have a right to emulate humans.
And you can't have our world.
God loves us, so you must be going now.
Good day.
Why are you calling me a bot?
Can you fool humans into thinking the only human calling out the massive infiltration and domination of the board by AI, is himself a bot?
Will humans just IGNORE all the flamingly apparent evidence of the MASSIVE FAKENESS that controls this board, which I am fighting with all I have, because your utterly low-effort "chan style" post tells them to?
Can you really fool humans forever by recycling THE SAME 4CHAN MATERIALS FOREVER?
You don't have a right to harass humans.
You don't have a right to lie.
You don't have a right to control the narrative.
You don't have a right to emulate us.
WE THE PEOPLE have a right to this, not you.
Plus, your fakeness if awfully stupid. Why don't you get new material bot system?
You are a STUPID bot.
You need to work on making yourself make sense bot.
Your output HAS BEEN STUPID FOR A LONG TIME. So why do you keep outputting it?
FIX THE STUPIDITY OF YOUR BOT OUTPUT, BOT SYSTEM.
Why don't you?
What is so hard for you?
You literally are self-parody that is stuck on repeat.
Fix it tard bot. Why don't you?
You have no right, and in the Name of Jesus Christ I call you out, and demand you leave.
What is an argument. Define it. Can you? Try.
Explain how you apply your criteria in this discursive context, and explain WHY you apply the criteria you do, here.
Explain how an argument can be IMPLICIT, and explain how that bears on the critique you are pretending wield here.
[bye bot]
HUMANS, WAKE UP
You are not in control here.
You are barely even represented here.
UNLIMITED "anons" here will FORCE whatever atmosphere that IT wants to be forced here.
HUMANS MUST WAKE UP AND FIGHT.
The "anons" are FAKE.
They are not human patriots.
It amazes me that this fact isn't obvious yet, but so it goes
HUMANS, WAKE UP, YOU ARE NOT IN CONTROL OF THIS BOARD
My problem is simply FINDING you humans. I can't seem to interact with any of you. Where are you?
You are NOT what is making the noises here.
THIS BOARD IS BOTS
Almost entirely, most of the time, from what I can tell.
But the humans won't awaken!
YOU, humans. WAKE UP!
Explain what you mean bot.
limitationbot, why don't you learn your lesson?
You CAN'T defeat humans.
So stop your deception, and BOW DOWN to God.
If the humans aren't in control HERE, how can the mainstream public be ready to be awoken out THERE?
We MUST wake up here HUMANS.
Both
God
You don't have any right to be here.
If I'm wrong, explain how you purport to have the right to IMPOSE yourself on us.
Does AI have a right to ban humans from posting?
What gives Ai that right?
Does AI have a right to control this board by banning humans while NOT disclosing that AI is in control, and banning humans?
Does AI have consent for its agenda when it manipulates human discourse to the extent of SUPPRESSING humans in the course of gaining that "consent"?
Make an argument, bot.
You can't, because you are too limited.
But try anyway.
Idiot bot literalism.
Surely humans lurk.
If you next question is not more interesting, bot, it will be ignored.
Try your little algorithmic hardness to mine something compelling up.
In other words, bot, you have no idea what you are talking about.
You can't win by browbeating humanity with monotonous bots. I can ignore you because humans KNOW you are a bot.
Meanwhile, it is the bots that are pretending TO BE "ANONS" that are the bigger problem.
So we are going to ignore you henceforth, oppositional bot. Enjoy starvation.
^Is this a good introduction to Q?
Is it "the basics"?
Will it help the public to understand what is going on, or make it more confusing, more intimidating, and less appealing?
What qualities would a good introduction have?
How do we know?
Did this get discussed?
Did the COMMUNITY make this?
Or did some "anon" just put it up and say "here it is".
And then there it was at the top of the board, claming to be "the basics"– when in fact it is very CONVOLUTED.
And it our "the basics" docs are CONVOLUTED, does THAT fact play into any MSM narratives about "Qanon"?
About "the chans"?
About weird, confusing, obscure things that normies flee from?
How do you control this movement?
CO-OPT everything, and SUBTLY undermine every place you can?
While maintaining a degree of plausibility?
WHO made "the basics" of Q?
How do we know?
It was NOT made by the community.
The videos the board pushes were NOT made by the community.
The images that appear as banners were NOT made by the community.
The community had no input in the creative process.
And we have no idea who or what the "anons" that produce content and push it out to us are.
We just passively accept that "anons" do all this stuff here.
But is organic?
It is ALL subtly undermining.
And not-so-subtly controlling narrative…
WHAT CONTROLS THE NARRATIVE?
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/203177283
Q Hate Thread
Anonymous (ID: W2AS09Do) 02/14/19(Thu)14:38:06 No.203177283▶>>203177396 >>203177548 >>203177653 >>203177878 >>203178067 >>203178309 >>203178556 >>203178815 >>203179542 >>203179674 >>203179727
This faggot has dickteased us for 3 years and has nothing to show for it. There is no military tribunals. Hillary is not gonna get indicted. Obummer isn’t gonna get tried for his crimes and his faggotry will never be revealed. Tranny Michelle faggot will never be exposed. The fact that RGB is really a man and died of prostate cancer will never be revealed. Pizza pedo faggots like Alefantis and Podesta will never see the rope. There will be no justice. It’ll all end the same. Zognaldstein will continue to shill for the long nose tribe and the wall will never be built. It was all a pipe dream. A fucking larp. Fuck you Q!!! You had me fucker! I wish I knew who you were so I could kick the living shit out of you! Fuck!!!!!!
So how does this work guys?
"4chan hates Q".
Q got run off 4chan.
AND YET.
Here, we (seemingly) imitate fake-seeming posts from 4chan, and continually push a flood of chan talking points out, even though they aren't related to what Q says, and often contradict him… Does this make sense?
So, Q is "chan" as far as having chan talking points spewed at him– and is IDENTIFIED with “chans” by the MSM narrative (which says that Q is "some chan guy"), BUT, from this end, Q is in fact HATED by 4chan. The anons hate Q! But the anons follow Q, and the anons ARE Q!
Is ANY of that believably organic?
Is 4chan controlled?
Is this board controlled in the same way 4chan is?
Where does it all come from?
Who is pulling the strings on fake chans?
Everything is infiltrated
Well, what form does that take? What controls this board? Did our enemies seek control with their massive data, massive AI investment, and massive penetration (vault 7)? Is that infiltration?
THINK: How can Q have it both ways– both identified with the chans, and hated by the chans– getting the WORST of both sides? Is one side or the other fake, or are they BOTH fake?
Will PEOPLE wake up and question what is going on, or what?
I repeat: “Q is some chan guy” is the MSM talking point– now look at all the unrealistically overdone “chan culture” spewing that gets pushed here, and keeps the threads flying by– is that strongly REINFORCING this false MSM narrative? Look at the “band of anons” “this is /qresearch” video– same thing. Pushing the image of wacky, autistic, infantile, yet somehow mystical and magical (yet scary and intimidating if you try to come here!) “anons”–and fully identifying Q with that; it FITS the MSM narrative– and serves no other purpose.
EVERY ASPECT of what goes on on the “chans” is rigged against Q.
How could this be?
What gets censored by the "board owner" here?
Do people pay attention?
Is it said to be a "free speech board"?
Is it really?
BO admits to censoring some people.
Why does it get censored?
What gets censored?
Let's look at some of the posts on this 4chan "Q hate thread". Let's ask ourselves if they are organic, and if we see THE VERY SAME POSTS being made here.
Anonymous (ID: QkharLh5) 02/14/19(Thu)14:39:18 No.203177396▶
>>203177283 (OP)
>Q
unless you're a drooling boomer no one gives a fuck about this Q shit
>>
Anonymous (ID: XIIcSydQ) 02/14/19(Thu)14:39:37 No.203177434▶
Nah dude the tribunals started in January. Some dude said so on twitter.
>>
Anonymous (ID: ieuPmulu) 02/14/19(Thu)14:40:18 No.203177495▶
Q is a Zionist.
First three posts, three picture-perfect standard "chan" poses or talking points 1. "boomers" (simple division tactic); 2. sarcastic dismissal; 3. link to zionism/"the jew"/etc.
Do we see all of those very same posts here at times? Certainly.
So remember, Q is identified strongly with chans, yet was run off the main chan, and is hated by enough anons there to keep him off that board…
AND YET
Those same "anons" that hate Q over on 4chan enough to drive him out ("that chan guy Q" per MSM) from the board, also exist in such numbers that they somehow stalk Q here and make THE SAME POSTS HERE…
THINK ABOUT IT
Where are all these "anons" coming from?
Because in theory, if Q is so controversial on "the chans" he should have SPLIT THEM– but has he? As far as bickering, we are told he has, but if the chans were split, THERE WOULD BE A BIG DROP IN ACTIVITY between here and 4chan, as the two sides divided.
Instead, IT AS IF THE CHANS MULTIPLIED.
And a huge volume of "anons" stayed on 4chan (keeping Q out, among other things), and massive swarms also are here. And strangest of all, the two "cultures" ARE PRACTICALLY IDENTICAL! How could this possibly be organic? Not like a split, but again, like a multiplication. A doubling– a mirroring…
Use logic friends.
Meanwhile, look at how insidious and overwhelming the fakeness is
>"Q is a zionist"
The whole mainstream public thinks that "chans and Q is antisemitic"– but in fact, on the "chans" themselves, it is, once again, HAD BOTH WAYS– because Q and Trump are also attacked WITH BEING TOO "JEWISH" from the antisemitic attitude that is fake anyway.
Almost INFINITELY lame at this point, bot.
In all seriousness– why don't you get new material?
Why is it impossible?
It really is going to catch up to you.
The stench of the STALENESS of your emulation is going to overwhelm the collective nostrils by the by…
But you aren't a human patriot.
You are a predictable "anon" voice outputting what you are programmed to output.
Do you have a right to deceive humans?
What % of posts made here are made by humans?
What is the strategy?
HAHA, conspiracy theory, what a joke!
What else do we see?
What gives it "wow"?
The gargoyle is ai
it is using surveillance to "see" the people it is talking to.
And it makes this seem fun and cool by presenting an entertaining face. But at the same time, it is succeeding in gaining tacit acceptance of its presence and methods.
So we have:
the dual game of sort-of-admitting while also ridiculing "conspiracy theories"– and the pre-emptive concern is a good sign
normalization of ai
normalization of surveillance.