>>5555154

All it will take is one fairly big mainstream Q proof all the rest will be brought in to focus. FB being CIA is tantalizingly close to being proof, and not full on tinfoil hat. But not quite there. The lifelog closure and FB start date "coincidence" is good. DARPA employees, good. But you're right, it's still quite a fringe notion. What is missing to make it a slam dunk? Do we need documents, FOIA? I just can't quite piece it together unfortunately.

(posting boobs on all my posts in case I accidentally hit the magic number)

>>5555252

You could be right anon, but even that is pretty spoopy. And Trump is the CinC, so…

But the other thing is that it is not random, it has clearly been planned. The Qlock works, the intel is good (re: FISA and coup) and it's not showy. If it was just political I'd expect constant hits for fairly low level scandals etc. Q is talking some pretty serious shit for political stunt.

>>5555320

I think they're scared. They think that if they step out of line, or wrongthink that there will be consequences. It's the self censorship they have been taught to employ on themselves.

They're also scared of losing a safety net, that if there's all this corruption going on that there's no one actually in control. They want peace and order, at any cost, but they don't see what their compliance costs the victims of the corruption (they're not shown it).

We have to show them that bullies can be stood up to, powerful criminals can be taken down without consequence, and what is going on in the world. Then more and more will come out of the SHADOW OF FEAR and join us.

>>5555332

>>5555344

I've noticed mine has a lot more brand names in it recently.

>>5555374

Satan, Satan. (just checking, yes it does capitalize that, kek, well I guess it is name)

Sorry anon, yes, I used to find swipe text really fast to use, but it's about 30% slower now Ruth some of the things it comes up with. (:s/Ruth/with)

Maybe it's just all the "unusual" stuff I've been writing lately, kek.

>>5555415

Well I don't mean outwardly scared anon, maybe fearful is a better word, but in a subliminal way?

And, BTW, I've read that laughter is an evolutionary remnant of the expression of fear. Like a pre-scream (which is panic/horror). We laugh at what we don't understand.

You're so right about 1984 though. I like that saying, "it wasn't meant to be an instruction manual".

>>5555465

No I've definitely noticed it, only over the last few weeks in fact.

And, "just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not out to get you."

>>5555505

Normally I'd be very happy with those digits. Kek.

>>5555521

Tolerance, anon. Doesn't mean you have hold hands and touch each other's bottoms.

>>5555555

5:5 anon