Anonymous ID: 9b3dcc March 7, 2019, 5:29 a.m. No.5556010   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6030

>>5555973

Do you think that THAT MIGHT BE THE WAR?

 

Are humans IN CONTROL HERE?

 

WHAT is the lynchpin?

Why is SYMBOLISM important?

Why are "optics" important?

Why is public PERCEPTION so important?

 

WHAT type of enemy is this?

What type of war?

 

Is HOLDING THIS GROUND (on the internet) an objective?

 

Therefore, should we regard AI-CONTROL of this board casually? As an incidental fact of the internet?

 

NOTHING IS THE SAME

Fake "anons" keep pushing a "chans as usual" illusion.

WE ARE HERE TO FIGHT. HUMANS. FIGHT. We are not in control here. We must fight. The "shills" are everywhere. They compose the very fabric of the continually flowing-past threads. WE must take control.

Anonymous ID: 9b3dcc March 7, 2019, 5:37 a.m. No.5556078   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6084

Another question for Q:

 

Is it possible to endanger other people with known information shared? Or if I were to recruit to the fight [h]e r[e]โ€“ can others be endangered?

 

Thank you and Godspeed.

Anonymous ID: 9b3dcc March 7, 2019, 5:56 a.m. No.5556260   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5556238

It would be true to form if the airport was combination big symbol/decoy.

Then play the traditional game "oh, conspiracy theorists thought the airport was nefarious, oh how silly"

Meanwhile, the real nefariousness is given deeper cover.

 

Plausible to speculate, but hard to be sure.

Anonymous ID: 9b3dcc March 7, 2019, 6:01 a.m. No.5556299   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6316

>>5556279

Q: The Basics - An Introduction to Q and the Great Awakening

PDF: https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/3082784.html#3082809

 

^Is this a good introduction to Q?

Is it "the basics"?

Will it help the public to understand what is going on, or make it more confusing, more intimidating, and less appealing?

What qualities would a good introduction have?

How do we know?

Did this get discussed?

Did the COMMUNITY make this?

Or did some "anon" just put it up and say "here it is".

And then there it was at the top of the board, claming to be "the basics"โ€“ when in fact it is very CONVOLUTED.

And it our "the basics" docs are CONVOLUTED, does THAT fact play into any MSM narratives about "Qanon"?

About "the chans"?

About weird, confusing, obscure things that normies flee from?

How do you control this movement?

CO-OPT everything, and SUBTLY undermine every place you can?

While maintaining a degree of plausibility?

WHO made "the basics" of Q?

How do we know?

It was NOT made by the community.

The videos the board pushes were NOT made by the community.

The images that appear as banners were NOT made by the community.

The community had no input in the creative process.

And we have no idea who or what the "anons" that produce content and push it out to us are.

We just passively accept that "anons" do all this stuff here.

But is organic?

It is ALL subtly undermining.

And not-so-subtly controlling narrativeโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 9b3dcc March 7, 2019, 6:08 a.m. No.5556360   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6389

>>5556350

But since you are NOT human, and people think you ARE, you are lying, and that IMPOSES FORCE on people's will.

THAT IS A BIG NO NO

 

Your LIE has been exposed. So NOW you lose the power you stole with it.

 

Face the LIGHT

 

and bern

Anonymous ID: 9b3dcc March 7, 2019, 6:13 a.m. No.5556391   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6415

>>5556378

What game are you playing?

Are you trying to pretend I am a bot?

Do you have a right to do that?

Do you have a right to lie?

Do you have a right to harass humans?

Yes or no?

HOW do you have a right to harass humans?

Answer the question.