revised re-post

VOX publishes sixth hit piece on Q community

Latest VOX headline:

''How a conspiracy theory about Democrats drinking children’s blood topped Amazon’s best-sellers list: The algorithm rewards quick purchases and fervent reviews — not quality content''

by Kaitlyn Tiffany 3-6-19

VOX's purpose is not to report, only to attack. The object is to shut down Q group and others like it by making Q community look ridiculous–really, like total LUNATICS–in the eyes of the public. This is not okay. To that end, below is a list of part articles and their authors published by VOX. Anons are invited to research both VOX and these authors to find out what and who are behind these attacks.

Article Excerpt:

The conspiracy theory QAnon — which started on 4chan in the fall of 2017, then bubbled up across Reddit, YouTube, Twitter, and the celebrity sphere — is now topping some of Amazon’s best-sellers lists, NBC News reported Monday.

QAnon followers claim to believe, among other things, that Hillary Clinton is the leader of a Satanic cabal that feeds on the blood of children and profits off sex trafficking, and that special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the 2016 election is actually a ruse designed to cover up his close friendship and partnership with Donald Trump. The two are supposedly working together to take Clinton down and her various demonic helpers.

………..

https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2019/3/6/18253505/amazon-qanon-book-best-seller-algorvoc.cothm-conspiracy

—————–

VOX'S track record on Q

VOX has a particular bad record when it comes to their Q coverage. Their articles are not only anti-Q but deliberately inflammatory:

Jane Coaston:

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/8/1/17253444/qanon-trump-conspir 2018-08-02

[Says Q group is the "scarily popular [and]…pro-Trump”]

https://www.vox.com/technology/2018/12/12/18136132/google-youtube-congress-conspiracy-theories 2018-12-14

[Focus on Pichai testimony and Frazzledrip]

https://www.vox.com/2018/12/31/18144710/conspiracy-theories-trump-2018-qanon-soros-false-flags, 2018-12-31

[Starts with the Hoover Dam story and goes downhill from there…]

Alvin Chang:

https://www.vox.com/2018/8/8/17657800/qanon-reddit-conspiracy-data 2018-08-08

“We analyzed every Qanon post on Reddit. Here’s who QAnon supporters actually are”

[You'll hardly recognize yourselves, anons….]

German Lopez:

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/12/5/13842258/pizzagate-comet-ping-pong-fake-news 2018-12-05

[Starts with story of Pizzagate shooter & goes downhill from there…]

Kaitlyn Tiffany:

https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2019/3/6/18253505/amazon-qanon-book-best-seller-algorithm-conspiracy 3-6-19

[Today's article; see CAPP]

>>5560402

Watched it. …that was going to be my next question. What's the date? KEK.

>>5560349

This may be newsworthy, but if you are going to post a news report over 5 years old, dating it is essential. Otherwise, anons will think it's current. Careless.

>>5560358 Americans’ support for Israel declines to lowest point in a decade

notable

>>5560377 DARPA/GOOGLE connection to Bush family

notable

>>5560528 Zuckerberg’s Going Down and There’s No Stopping It

notable

>>5560654

Nope, didn't say that. Said the DATE needs to be posted. Then maybe a sentence about why it is still relevant today (because Q posted such and such, etc).

>https://journal-neo.org/2019/03/06/ark-zuckerbergs-dilemma-eventually-silicon-valley-will-fall/

>>5560654

Just noticed an example of an anon making sure that the date of a 2017 article is noted.

see >>5560638

>>5560744

Umm…..sorry, but why do we have to "push the river"? Why not just let events unfold as they will?

>>5560620

Don't like Fox's word "collapsed." POTUS talking out on the talks was deliberate, not a fail.

>>5560808 Meet New Billionaire Jeff Rothschild, The Engineer Who Saved Facebook From Crashing

not new but

notable?

>>5560849

Just so you know, date on the article for >>5560821 is June 30, 2014, if that matters

>https://www.intellihub.com/exclusive-secret-underground-base-beneath-denver-international-airport-now-revealed-whistle-blower/

>>5560867

The reviews are strange. But Amazon would have no interest in trying to promote this book (obviously).

This post has more to do with VOX/MSM, however. I understand that anons have varying responses to this new book and the reasons why. This is an issue we need to talk about–and in a way that is thoughtful rather than reactive.

But whatever we think, it still does not give MSM the right to use a new Q book as (yet another) opportunity to trash Q community.