>>5560952 (/lb)
Here's another nugget you could try: Pollock and the abstract expressionists.
They suddenly became fashionable organically, just like that, or funded by CIA?
Welp, as outlandish as it seems, the CIA funding has been admitted and is now part of above-ground normie knowledge.
Yes, yes, of course it's downplayed as nothing-to-see-here, but:
-it's real
-it was denied for decades
-same question applies… "why would they do that?"
but most of all…
if they are willing, able, and documented to have spent millions in funding and manpower just to favor one painting style over another…
is it that crazy that they would want to funnel citizens to an all-encompassing automated panopticon?