This kind of posting is division-fagging, IMO. You don't critique Nemos, just suggest he's a faggot because of the book just out. You don't like what he's doing? Offer a coherent argument explaining why. Otherwise, you are no better than the MSM.
Can you post a pic of the murals at least, so we can see what you're talking about?
RIP.
I have no problem with differences of opinion. Well-reasoned debate is a great way to get ideas on the table and let anons decide for themselves what to think.
I do have a problem with vague unsauced allegations, innuendo, memes without arguments, and bandwagon appeals (targeting unpopular people because you know you'll get support, even without much sauce).
QResearch is about bona fide research and logical arguments. And the arguments better be something more substantial than "he's a paytriot."
I'll be happy to check out Nemos. Got a link for the arrest record? How about the real estate deal gone wrong? The Pamphlet scandal? Lot of people here don't like P but if you want to convince other people, you need to explain exactly what went down, in your view.
This isn't the first time I've heard anons criticize someone who Q has not called out but in a way where listeners cannot determine the merits of the argument. Yes, I know it's tiresome but that is what good journalism and good research requires. I will never just jump on the bandwagon because anons state an opinion.
And please just state the group Nemos wants to fight. If you have facts, plz state them.
Yes, plenty of people get a big YT following if listeners like their way of presenting stuff. There is nothing suspicious in that.
thanks, that really helps. Even the scantily-clad female isn't porn. Nice mural, can support.
signed it, almost to target goal of 2500