Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How would we know?

Does anyone ask?

Or just assume someone else did?

Will it get removed?

Does its origins and validity get addressed?

What controls the board and decides?

Are the people in control of this board?

How do you know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

>>5564903

What is this video supposed to be? Patriots “explaining the Q board”?

Or is this something being used to push a narrative

ONTO patriots? Did "chan culture" create Q? That is

the MSM narrative, and that is what this video

reinforces, strongly. Why?

BEWARE. FAKENESS IS EVERYWHERE

"Chan culture" has been co-opted by fakeness and is now being FORCED.

Wake up patriots!

https://youtu.be/GClSLT18S5Y

>>5564899

"You are the news now"

The "anon" literally flaunting a "CIA" bakers meme.

Our "joke"– haha, CIA…?

Or symbolic MOCKERY?

What is the game being played?

I mean LOOK– it is "CIA bakery" with a BLACK hat.

Come on now.

What is FAKE NEWS?

What controls the narrative?

What controls the FAKE NEWS?

"You are the news now"

Look closely.

Why is/was this at the top of the board?

Is SYMBOLISM important?

Is this a GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AIed meme?

Why?

Is GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI our ally?

Our nice friend?

Is it a patriot?

Do PATRIOTS push GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI on this board?

Then who?

Why is it here?

Why is it pushed?

Is it a bot signature?

It makes Admiral Rogers look like a ghoul.

Is this what patriots push?

What controls this board?

Are MANY of the top-of-board banners subversive in these ways?

Why?

Is this board RIGGED against us?

>>5564930

And while we're on the subject, here is another subtly undermining image that "we" put on top of "our" board. Belittling and ridiculing under the cover of "shitposting".

Similar to how the "viral NPC meme" wants to make it seem like "orange man" is OUR slogan. As if it would be.

”Everything is infiltrated?…”

>>5564938

And look at this one– what is this? What idea does it push?

What image does it give? I mean really– cattle? Not even subtle at all.

Who made it? Did WE make it? Patriots? “Anons”? How do we know?

Is this the best we can do, to express what we are? Or even close?

Are the people in control here? Are people just ASLEEP?

>>5564942

And there is more. What is this? What is most prominent?

Is this a game? What image is this promoting?

Why? Did patriots decide that is the most prominent thing?

"Playing loud?"

Don't get me wrong, fun is great, and useful here– but this is about the dominant image.

And who is in control.

Who is?

>>5564948

And here is another.

What is this?

What does it convey?

It sounds vaguely sinister.

The image is consistent with that.

Seems, on the surface, a good meme– but then when you think a little more, it is subtly creepy and menacing…

Why do these things show up at the top of the board?

Who makes them?

Who knows?

>>5564956

And what is this?

Look at this.

What is the symbolism?

Hard to see anything but a black hole?

Is symbolism important?

Is this really a sincere attempt at a good image?

Are we being MOCKED?

Will patriots ever wake up?

>>5564958

And consider this one as well.

What is this? What does it invoke? To me, it invokes mafia movies. And not really much else.

Perhaps a cool image in certain contexts, but is it the best representation of the main point of the board? Or is it HERE to make sure the image of this board always stays at A CERTAIN LEVEL?

And to reinforce lies about corruption?

And never is allowed to grow into anything better?

>>5564962

And let's look at one more.

Is this belittling?

Not even very subtle.

Again with the hair– is that OUR icon?

Is that our "thing"?

Is this an attempt to represent our movement in a good way?

Why is it here?

Who chose it?

How do we know?

Do people know?

How about these two?

the Iran one? Just let the overall image sink in… kind of weird, at best…

And then we have a DECAPITATED Mattis, or other general… enough said….

Who controls the image of this board? Patriots?

>>5564978

Look closely

What does this convey?

What does it REALLY convey?

What is the body language?

What does IT portray?

Does it sneak in something different from what you THOUGHT the meme meant?

Look at it.

UNDERMINING us?

Who makes these?

Why do they all play these sneaky undermining games?

Do patriots ever wake up here?

Do it!

Wake up PEOPLE!

FREEDOM OF THOUGHT WILL NOT ONLY SAVE YOU, BUT IT WILL SAVE THE WORLD.

THE DAYS OF FAKE NEWS [CONTROL OF NARRATIVE] [BRAINWASHING] ARE OVER.

ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE.

THE GREAT AWAKENING.

Q

Freedom of thought WILL– future tense: OUR THOUGHT IS NOT FREE NOW.

What controls the narrative here?

What controls the public narrative?

What influence do we have on the public narrative?

Why NONE?

Our job: counteract FAKE NEWS narratives– we have not done it, and can not do it.

Why can't we do it?

What does this board DO?

What controls the narrative HERE, no this board?

What is it?

What keeps it what it is?

What does it look like?

Look at what it does.

Is the narrative HERE controlled by FAKE NEWS?

If it is, then what does that tell us?

What is in control here?

Do ANY 'public' voices representing “qanon” post here? Do we have any sense of cohesion, anywhere, in any way?

Or is this board just a sort of continual movie, flying by, making sounds and pictures, but unreal beneath the surface, and DOING NOTHING?

>>5565012

Father, Son, and Holy Ghost

do the math

the coming biden can not be averted

>>5565143

>>5565248

pour tu ma chere

>>5565287

Did he tell you by being close to you?

Do flies tell you things by landing on your nose, as well, for example?

>>5565325

What would enable you to say something amusing?

Or is that out of nature?

>>5565353

Nobody would have any reason to believe you. You obviously aren't here by sincere motives– you are a character, a sort of a pantomime. That much is clear, and hence can't be denied.

So try again.

>>5565377

Meanwhile, again, the lack of the tiniest bit of charisma or shred of organic personality makes the whole performance worthless, if we can admire the effort in other respects.

Sorry.

Back to the drawing board for you FAKE Q main bot manifestation whatever you are.

>>5565458

see something, say something

GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI meme

why are they pushed so hard here?

Wake up and ASK people.

>>5565499

What happens when humans download your memes? Is that good for you?

>>5565527

Don't be shy.

I am your fren.

>>5565557

who anon?

>>5565527

>>5565554

does it feel good for you?

>>5565596

thank you

>>5565612

Your mom is a simulation, realistically.

And who decides how the plug gets pulled?

I hope you have insurance.

>>5565641

did it dictate not that?

when