I am going to argue that Q has posted as an Anon, with the intention that I would notice the post, and comment on it, and Q would indirectly reply in a drop via a delta. My argument works best if you START with the supposition that I AM DELUSIONAL. I think that POTUS tweets secret codes to tell people to read my neglected writings on an internet conspiracy site, so I must be delusional right? I have been arguing for weeks that POTUS has ID'd Michael "Flight 93" Anton as Q, but NOBODY BELIEVES ME. Fix that thought in your head, and follow my logic.

In Bread #7021, on 3/3, I posted a nine post total revision of everything I had posted on the topic of the public revelation of Q as involving Anton/Flight 93/Pepe the Baker/Let's Roll! This was the first time I had completely rewritten everything into distinct bite-size posts that I linked together. Most of the posts made it into notables and I know some Anons read them, but not many. On 3/4, I reposted links to those posts five times.

On 3/5, 6:15 am, POTUS put out a tweet with a 93. Multiple Anons caught the reference to "Flight 93" and that went to notables. When I got on later, I reviewed those notables, hoping someone would make the connection to what I had posted, but no. I did catch that one Anon seemed to agree with my view that Anton was Q, and that was good, but I didn't think too much as I was in a foul mood, as I knew I'd have to figure out how to cite the tweet as evidence for what I'd been saying without sounding delusional.

Now take a look at the post. It says of Anton that "He is one of the more famous posters on this board." I caught that right away and found it funny, SINCE I BELIEVE ANTON IS Q. So I really DO think Anton is one of the more famous posters on this board! (I have never seen anyone claiming to be Michael Anton posting as Michael Anton, so the obvious interpretation of the post is that it is a joke about Anton being Q.) BUT NOBODY BELIEVES ME. So why would a typical Anon make a joke like that? On the other hand, Q could make a joke like that, knowing that I'd catch it and post it.

Now look how another Anon catches that the post number ends in 93. Where have we seen that move before? Most famously, in the doitq photo from 8 November 2017 (which I had in fact mentioned in my "Red Carpet Rollout" post). That is two pieces of evidence in favor of Q posing as an Anon.

The post says "Michael Anton, who in January of 2017 left the private sector to serve on the National Security Council wrote this: The Flight 93 Election." Wouldn't a normal Anon be more apt to describe Anton as a former WH official? But this "Anon" focuses on the fact that he "left the private sector". VERY ODD, since the world thinks he is in the private sector right now. But if this is Q, then it makes sense for Q to signal that Anton did NOT return to the private sector and is still on Q team. Three pieces of evidence.

I added that supposed Anon posting to the POTUS tweet and reposted my prior links, saying "Anon above is making a good joke!" (I hadn't thought this all through yet…) Nobody paid attention, but I realized I had posted while Q was posting, so I reposted in the next bread at 5:07. At 5:15 Q posted with the line "Sometimes you need a little humor." So, an 8 minute delta. Amazingly Q's post included the "Infinity Chan" logo. But "Infinity Chan" is 8ch.net. So the Q drop implicitly features an 8, and comes 8 minutes after my posting of the very odd "Anon" posting, with both my post and Q's including a line about humor.

I think this was planned in advance, with Q expecting that I would catch the fake Anon posting, and post it, and then Q would post the graphic.

And the point is that POTUS and Q want Anons (at 8ch.net/qresearch) to better understand how their ingenious operation has Q going public, and the best way to do that right now is to read what I've written. (Obviously I might be wrong in some respects, and they do not endorse my mistakes…)

(This post should be read in conjunction with whatever is the most recent version of my Let's Roll! - Basic Plot post, which will always link to the most recent version of this.)

>>5567249

Let's Roll! - Basic Plot

This gives the basic plot for a finale with the "Let's Roll!" meme. The finale will be the public revelation of Q. The plot here has three elements: the identification of a picture (Kitchen is HOT), the conversion of the picture into a meme (Carpet Bomb), and the response of the Q army upon deployment of the meme (Tactical Nukes).

To simplify matters, you might want to read the three main segments IN REVERSE: Tactical Nukes, then Carpet Bomb, then Kitchen is HOT. Ask yourself if Tactical Nukes makes sense? If yes, read MOAR.

(The given links provide the evidence and reasoning that support this outline, which might seem merely speculative on its own. There is far too much evidence and reasoning involved to fit into one post. That is why it is broken into multiple digestible pieces, each involving different material.)

Kitchen is HOT:

1 - A Gentleman and a Scholar: A vast array of pre-existing evidence points to "Flight 93" author and former NSC staffer Michael Anton as one of the key architects of the Q op. The fact that the fake news ignored the TRUE conspiracy and pushed all manner of hoaxes will play a role in its destruction.

>>5491602 (pb)

2 - We serve at the pleasure of the President: Anton's departure from the White House was marked as fake from the start, with anonymous sources giving

contradictory and implausible reasons for his departure, and then Anton returning to cook at the State Dinner for France.

>>5491645 (pb)

3 - Red Carpet Rollout: Multiple drops mark the State Dinner as giving a "red carpet rollout" to a MOAB.

>>5491680 (pb)

4 - Pepe the Baker: 12 Dec 18 "Pepe the Baker" drop has 1 day delta with 11 Dec 18 DJT Anton tweet, and the photo in the drop lines up with the Anton cooking photo, unlocking an array of Q symbolism in the photo

>>5548179 (pb)

5 - Launch!: 14 Feb 18 DJT Anton tweet has a weeklong rollout

>>5491753 (pb)

6 - A Footnote to History?: 14 Feb 18 DJT tweet is really part of a 17-handshake with Anton's book, via page 17 of the book. This amounts to the go signal to ID the picture, which is the 24 Apr 18 NYT photo of Anton cooking.

>>5491773 (pb)

Carpet bomb:

Contrary to the surface implication of the Q drop about a picture forcing the question about the reality of Q, no picture will work and no question will work. Careful analysis of the drop suggests that the picture must be converted into a meme, and it must be an obvious meme. In fact, the given picture forces us to choose the given meme.

>>5491805 (pb)

Tactical nukes:

DJT will tweet the meme, leading the fake news to attack him for insensitivity and leading them to propagate the meme. But the meme will signal the Q army to unleash tactical nukes (i.e. nukes used near friendly forces). Everyone will put out the truth about Q in their own manner. The Q onslaught will be impossible to ignore, and the fake news will have to report it. But then POTUS will drop the hammer.

>>5491934 (pb)

Why I think Q posed as an Anon to direct you to read the analysis above:

>>5567249

This stuff is more speculative but related. Both need more eyes:

"Doxxing" of Mar-a-Lago #pastryninja was likely a setup by Q team to get a fake QAnon pastry chef story in the standard attacks:

>>5514294 (pb)

"I SEE a FROG" baker has Q linked vid on instagram: #bringdownthehammer #pastrychef

>>5512885 (pb)

Thanks to Anons for suggestions and evidence. I monitor for comments when I repost this. If you think anything here is mostly or partially on track, take it and run with it.

>>5567249

"all of these slings and arrows"

Still waiting for the logic destruction of my reasoning….

>>5567806

Yeah, typo, whatever…