I keep being drawn back to Qs post re Something is Rotten in the Denver Airport. Not bc of the article but bc of the responses to it. It was written in 2012 and there is a person who responds (first as AI Cum and later as AI Cummings) repeatedly to other people’s posts over the years, insisting it’s just an airport, nothing to see here, etc. Why would someone be so obsessed to return repeatedly year after year to refute an article and anyone who reads it and responds to it? Why the tenacity? Why is AI Cummings/AI Cum so relentless in debunking the article and people who respond to it? Reminds me of the tenacity of the Krackenstains. Could Q be telling us to look at the comments to the article rather than just the article, which is a subject that many of us have known about for a long time?
Kek
Hmmmm
Maybe. I had to go back and look at the pics again. There is a big red arrow pointing to the words beneath it. So, yea, maybe oscam's razor, go with the obvious explanation.
I suppose Q could have used a number of ways to point out March 19th and this would be a way of rubbbing salt into their wounds by using their own sick symbols.
Well that goes deeper than I was thinking.
Maybe.
I was just thing about how for so many years people have been working on damage control
It doesn't seem very PR
The comments are very acidic and condescending, ridiculing conspiracy theorists, etc.
Unless that's how PR works behind the scenes.
The artwork looks like it came out of a cheap comic book, so I would imagine PR would be pretty busy defending it after the public saw it, it's hideous.