(repost - hit me with LOGIC)
I am going to argue that Q has posted as an Anon, with the intention that I would notice the post, and comment on it, and Q would indirectly reply in a drop via a delta. My argument works best if you START with the supposition that I AM DELUSIONAL. I think that POTUS tweets secret codes to tell people to read my neglected writings on an internet conspiracy site, so I must be delusional right? I have been arguing for weeks that POTUS has ID'd Michael "Flight 93" Anton as Q, but NOBODY BELIEVES ME. Fix that thought in your head, and follow my logic.
In Bread #7021, on 3/3, I posted a nine post total revision of everything I had posted on the topic of the public revelation of Q as involving Anton/Flight 93/Pepe the Baker/Let's Roll! This was the first time I had completely rewritten everything into distinct bite-size posts that I linked together. Most of the posts made it into notables and I know some Anons read them, but not many. On 3/4, I reposted links to those posts five times.
On 3/5, 6:15 am, POTUS put out a tweet with a 93. Multiple Anons caught the reference to "Flight 93" and that went to notables. When I got on later, I reviewed those notables, hoping someone would make the connection to what I had posted, but no. I did catch that one Anon seemed to agree with my view that Anton was Q, and that was good, but I didn't think too much as I was in a foul mood, as I knew I'd have to figure out how to cite the tweet as evidence for what I'd been saying without sounding delusional.
Now take a look at the post. It says of Anton that "He is one of the more famous posters on this board." I caught that right away and found it funny, SINCE I BELIEVE ANTON IS Q. So I really DO think Anton is one of the more famous posters on this board! (I have never seen anyone claiming to be Michael Anton posting as Michael Anton, so the obvious interpretation of the post is that it is a joke about Anton being Q.) BUT NOBODY BELIEVES ME. So why would a typical Anon make a joke like that? On the other hand, Q could make a joke like that, knowing that I'd catch it and post it.
Now look how another Anon catches that the post number ends in 93. Where have we seen that move before? Most famously, in the doitq photo from 8 November 2017 (which I had in fact mentioned in my "Red Carpet Rollout" post). That is two pieces of evidence in favor of Q posing as an Anon.
The post says "Michael Anton, who in January of 2017 left the private sector to serve on the National Security Council wrote this: The Flight 93 Election." Wouldn't a normal Anon be more apt to describe Anton as a former WH official? But this "Anon" focuses on the fact that he "left the private sector". VERY ODD, since the world thinks he is in the private sector right now. But if this is Q, then it makes sense for Q to signal that Anton did NOT return to the private sector and is still on Q team. Three pieces of evidence.
I added that supposed Anon posting to the POTUS tweet and reposted my prior links, saying "Anon above is making a good joke!" (I hadn't thought this all through yet…) Nobody paid attention, but I realized I had posted while Q was posting, so I reposted in the next bread at 5:07. At 5:15 Q posted with the line "Sometimes you need a little humor." So, an 8 minute delta. Amazingly Q's post included the "Infinity Chan" logo. But "Infinity Chan" is 8ch.net. So the Q drop implicitly features an 8, and comes 8 minutes after my posting of the very odd "Anon" posting, with both my post and Q's including a line about humor.
I think this was planned in advance, with Q expecting that I would catch the fake Anon posting, and post it, and then Q would post the graphic.
And the point is that POTUS and Q want Anons (at 8ch.net/qresearch) to better understand how their ingenious operation has Q going public, and the best way to do that right now is to read what I've written. (Obviously I might be wrong in some respects, and they do not endorse my mistakes…)