>>5573357 lb
You mischaracterize my position. Assuming I am upset because of red text is false. Was merely to highlight amongst all the clutter. Secondly, Anons are not really paying attention. If Q signaling that the meeting between Huber and Barr was the same meeting that was suppose to correspond with 's recent timeline, then I take issue with it. Many things were suppose to take place first. On top of that, the meeting was suppose to be with Barr, Huber and OIG. It was not. In fact, the meeting was an Advisory meeting in a public setting. Any thinking person would know that FISA abuses and other matters Huber is investigating would NOT be in an open setting. So yeah, there is a serious problem with Q wanting anons to think that Advisory meeting was THE meeting. Confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance is strong.
Maybe you need to step back and not tell other anons what to do.
>>5573367 lb
That we know of. We know nothing has been leaked about it.