>>5574682 (pb)

>As I see it, Q/POTUS have STILL left it ambiguous as to whether both are black hats, gray hats, or even white hats.

Respectfully, Anon, I agree about there being ambiguities with Q's posts. But why do you avoid thinking about the probability that both are white or grey hats? There are at least a dozen Q posts I can show you as supporting evidence that Mueller and [RR] are grey hats and working with POTUS/Q (light) since the day of their 2017 appointments. While each of those Q posts contain ambiguous interpretations that they could be black hats, you will not be able to find even one of Q's posts that unambiguously supports your argument. If you think you can, please do so and I will be happy to be proven wrong. But don't be surprised if I show you the ambiguity in that post that proves you wrong.