Anonymous ID: 03b814 March 8, 2019, 6:51 p.m. No.5583509   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3515 >>3680 >>3773 >>3903 >>4149 >>4229

Disformation 2019 at SXSW: Jonathon Morgan and New Knowledge return to the spotlight (Scandal? What scandal?)

3-8-16

PAGE 1 of 2

 

Remember Jonathon Morgan? He was the subject of a BIG DIGG just a couple of months ago. Things weren't going too well for him due to the Alabama election meddling scandal in which he has been accused of trying to affect the outcome of a Senatorial election. Last we saw him in early January, he was in a world of hurt, protesting his innocence, insisting that he was just doing a "small experiment" on social media–nothing with the power to change election results. Nevertheless, Dem Roy Moore unexpectedly won over Repub Doug Jones. See next page for the back story.

 

If Morgan had been a Trump supporter, this "experiment" would certainly have completely and permanently destroyed his career. He would likely have been investigated by the FBI. But he's a liberal, so there's no hue and cry; FB suspended his account, but that's not much of a penalty. I've been wondering just how long it would take for his reputation to be miraculously resurrected.

 

Not long at all, just 2 months (less if you include planning time). Because this week at the SXSW conference, not only is Morgan participating–his company New Knowledge is organizing six sessions (see also CAP).

 

New Knowledge Panels (Disinformation 2019)

 

Disinformation 2019: Brands in the Crosshairs

Jonathon Morgan & Robert Matney (NK) & Mo Johnson (Data for Democracy–also part of NK); Joshua Lowcock (vc); & Janice Peason (Bayer).

"How responsible corporate leaders can best defend brand reputation & equity."

[Anons, note the last person is from BAYER…."]

 

AI: the Silver Bullet against disinformation?

Shaarik Zafar (Facebook) & Annie Klomhaus (New Knowledge)

 

Fighting Misinformation & Defending the Open Web

Discussion of how to use legislation to combat the spread of misinformation (although there is lip service given to free speech).

 

Media Literacy: The Real Impact of Fake News

"A multi-sensory experience that focuses on media literacy." [Huh??]

 

Brand: the New Political Reality

Experts discuss branding: "Brands have become our reality." They can get boycotted for taking thewrong position on an issue, "so it's never been more important to get it right."

 

How Can we Fight Fake News without Killing the Truth?

Internet facilitates the flow of info but also "fake news, post-truth & hate speech," creating "chaos." How to "ensure that all [online] stakeholders…have their right of free expression and their right to not be manipulated protected?"

 

[Whoa, whoa, whoa….I think we've finally hit the jackpot.

''What exactly is the Right NOT to be manipulate?''

Sounds like a "freedom FROM" right–exactly the kind the Dems want instead of the "freedom TO" rights already guaranteed by our Constitution. Look what they are just slipping in here, hoping nobody grasp its significance.]

Anonymous ID: 03b814 March 8, 2019, 6:52 p.m. No.5583515   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3680 >>3903 >>4149 >>4229

>>5583509

Update on Jonathon Morgan

<<< If you want to know why we should keep our sites trained on JM, look at this meme he used in an article he wrote for Wapo in 2016. The article link is also revealing.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/09/26/these-charts-show-exactly-how-racist-and-radical-the-alt-right-has-gotten-this-year/?utm_term=.2d508c165976

 

PAGE 2 of 2

 

The Back Story on Jonathon Morgan & New Knowledge Scandal

(For SAUCE and more details, see >>5240271 pb)

 

On Dec. 20, in Q 2635, Q referred us to a Fox article describing the Alabama election meddling scandal in which Dems oversaw operations manipulating social media in order to destroy support for Repub. candidate Roy Moore.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-operatives-created-fake-russian-bots-in-alabama-race-designed-to-link-kremlin-to-republican-roy-moore

 

The result was a huge digg by anons with so many posts that one of them who is also a baker developed an ongoing bun to organize them: >>5153522 pb

 

One of the key characters in this drama was Jonathon Morgan, head of New Knowledge, a company that has used a questionable algorithm, Hamilton 68 (partially developed by Morgan) to detect and analyze the activity of "Russian bots" on Twitter. So Morgan is clearly committed to the fake "muh Russia" propaganda "BIG LIE" narrative–hook, line, and sinker.

 

On Dec. 17, 2018 a report by New Knowledge was given to the SSCI that the latter planned to use to politically push the "muh Russia" narrative as far as they could.

 

But two days later, that ambition was nixed by a breaking story from Scott Shane of the NYT, detailing a project by New Knowledge to create the impression that the Senatorial candidate Doug Jones was being followed by hundreds of Russian bots.

 

Other media leaders ran with the story, which both discredited Morgan and ruined the sSCI's plan to use the New Knowledge report as a (pseudo-) scientific justification for promoting "muh Russia."

 

Meanwhile, everyone involved in the scandal decided to use Morgan as the fall guy, leaving him to desperately protest his innocence in a Medium article on Jan 2.(Although it's doubtful he was innocent, he wasn't the main planner; see the link at the top.)

 

Since his protest article, Morgan has been pretty quiet. Until now.

Anonymous ID: 03b814 March 8, 2019, 7:21 p.m. No.5584000   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5583810

TWO CAPS for Smollett charges

 

1.

>https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6788309/Grand-jury-charges-Jussie-Smollett-SIXTEEN-felony-counts-filing-false-police-report.html

 

2.

https://abc7chicago.com/jussie-smollett-indicted-on-16-felony-counts-by-grand-jury/5177586/

Anonymous ID: 03b814 March 8, 2019, 7:31 p.m. No.5584171   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5584152

UK has their own problems apart from EU when it comes to censorship. One anon mentioned VPN's but I don't know whether they have regs around that in the UK. Any UK anons here?