Anonymous ID: 97f84d March 5, 2018, 11:32 a.m. No.558547   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8573 >>8575 >>8623 >>8823 >>8862 >>8870 >>8934 >>8995 >>9128

Is Q really pushing the narrative that Jesus was a real man? Why are so many anons still falling for the Jesus deception?

 

Jesus is a caricature of the sun, as almost all Biblical characters are. The twelve tribes of Israel are the twelve zodiacal signs. The entire Bible is based on astrology; Christianity and Islam are idolatrous pagan religions utilizing a central figure which is offered for people to "imitate" for a living.

 

This is how the RCC and Islam have enslaved people for the past few thousand years, and why wealthy elite families sit behind the various denominations. It is all deception.

Anonymous ID: 97f84d March 5, 2018, 11:51 a.m. No.558659   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8711 >>8717 >>8730 >>8757 >>8868 >>8989

>>558573

>>558623

 

My God are you not aware that J. Flavius was a forger/fraud?

 

Even if the Josephus passage were authentic, which we have essentially proved it not to be, it nevertheless would represent not an eyewitness account but rather a tradition passed along for at least six decades, long after the purported events. Hence, the TF would possess little if any value in establishing an "historical" Jesus. In any event, it is quite clear that the entire passage in Josephus regarding Christ, the Testimonium Flavianum, is spurious, false and a forgery. Regarding the TF, Remsburg summarizes:

 

"For nearly sixteen hundred years Christians have been citing this passage as a testimonial, not merely to the historical existence, but to the divine character of Jesus Christ. And yet a ranker forgery was never penned….

 

"Its brevity disproves its authenticity. Josephus' work is voluminous and exhaustive. It comprises twenty books. Whole pages are devoted to petty robbers and obscure seditious leaders. Nearly forty chapters are devoted to the life of a single king. Yet this remarkable being, the greatest product of his race, a being of whom the prophets foretold ten thousand wonderful things, a being greater than any earthly king, is dismissed with a dozen lines…."

 

The dismissal of the passage in Josephus regarding Jesus is not based on "faith" or "belief" but on intense scientific scrutiny and reasoning. Such investigation has been confirmed repeatedly by numerous scholars who were mostly Christian. The Testimonium Flavianum, Dr. Lardner concluded in none too forceful words, "ought, therefore…to be discarded from any place among the evidences of Christianity." With such outstanding authority and so many scientific reasons, we can at last dispense with the pretentious charade of wondering if the infamous passage in the writings of Josephus called the Testimonium Flavianum is forged and who fabricated it.

 

I'll be willing to bet that Q won't even touch the topics of Christianity/Islam; namely call them out for what they are, false religions.

 

It is obvious that Islam is being used to destabilize the West via non-military forms of jihad (social via sharia anti-blasphemy, civilizational via immigration etc.) why doesn't Q ever talk about this?

Anonymous ID: 97f84d March 5, 2018, 12:04 p.m. No.558757   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>558659

>>558711

 

This makes sense, though there is literally no record/proof of this in the public domain outside of Tony Bushby's book 'The Crucifixion of Truth' wherein he states that Muhammad was a Catholic Cardinal overlooked for pope.

 

It seems likely to me that Islam was erected by the Vatican to extinguish "unbelievers" and that naturally they would have needed a proxy to eradicate any individuals which did not willingly submit to their rule.

 

If you have any other sources to this claim I'd be interested in them. If not I still find this to be the most likely case.

 

This also makes me wonder why Q is dancing around this issue of Christianity/Islam so much. They are obviously the cornerstone of the enslavement which exists on this planet.

Anonymous ID: 97f84d March 5, 2018, 12:18 p.m. No.558868   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>558659

>>558717

 

Announcing you have a masters in theology is essentially a declaration that you yourself can't form your own opinion.

 

I know the Bible is not historical. I know the characters within in are allegorical, as the Apostle Paul himself states in Cor. I know the entire contents of the Bible are ripped from Egypt, who derived all of it from the twelve Zodiac. I know the twelve tribes of Israel are the twelve zodiac. I know Jesus surrounded by twelve apostles is the sun surrounded by twelve zodiac.

 

Do they teach you this in your masters degree, or do they teach you J. Flavius is a legitimate source and that Jesus was REAL?

 

Give me a break; step one is understanding the Bible is mystical/allegorical

 

Step 1: Learn the two trees