Anonymous ID: b6c2c8 March 5, 2018, 12:10 p.m. No.558801   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>558774

>/_\ - Rock (past)(auth over followers)

> _\ (present)

 

We had _\ remaining, now it seems we are down to: _

Saud was first to fall, now Soros, only Roths remaining?

Anonymous ID: b6c2c8 March 5, 2018, 12:27 p.m. No.558934   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9025 >>9034

>>558547

No serious scholar, atheist or otherwise, denies the existence of a historical Jesus.

You can deny the supernatural interpretations of his life, but you really have to put some bias to work to deny that he was a dude who lived around 0 AD.

I get that you have a bunch of esoteric bullshit you are eager to push onto everyone, but that doesn't mean you get to rewrite common sense history to suit your purposes.

Half the time it's driven by people who never grew out of the 14-year-old thinking that saying "Jesus didn't exist. AKCHUALLY…" adds some sort of "wokeness" to your worldview.