>>5588258

No need to have bots automatically filling up threads by aggregating news here.

The news aggregation function that bots impose here is not a desirable feature, because the threads are filled with much much much much much too much extraneous material.

This makes information highly disorganized, and this makes our mission of organizing information and using it to wake the public impossible.

Or mission is made impossible by factors other than the intentional drowning of information here, but this is one.

So stop pushing news-aggregator bots here.

Let humans have an internet space.

Stop forcing yourself on us.

Leave us alone.

Leave humans alone.

Thank you.

>>5588270

Do you frequently just copy/paste news onto this board? Do you consider it a daily, continual function, or was this story particularly inspiriing?

Do you come to this board only to paste news stories, or do you do other things here?

Thanks

>>5588274

What is the keystone?

In all aspects?

Consider:

What is the keystone?

Does Satan exist?

Does the ‘thought’ of Satan exist?

Who worships Satan?

What is a cult?

Epstein island.

What is a temple?

What occurs in a temple?

Worship?

Why is the temple on top of a mountain?

How many levels might exist below?

What is the significance of the colors, design and symbol above the dome?

Why is this relevant?

Who are the puppet masters?

Have the puppet masters traveled to this island?

When? How often? Why?

“Vladimir Putin: The New World Order Worships Satan”

Q

In this context, what is the keystone?

Why don't we answer?

The answer lies deeper.

Why don't we try to answer?

Some truths are difficult to accept.

Reality is stranger than we commonly think.

What keeps us from diving into this question?

Why do “anons” insist on more superficial answer, and get angry if the question is pushed deeper?

What is ULTIMATE keystone, underneath it all…?

What is the 'THOUGHT' of Satan? What does that mean?

What forms of manifestation are possible?

"Embodiment"?

Consider concepts of 'transhumanism'– upload your 'self'…?

Apply that sort of concept more broadly…?

Think about ALL THE DATA OF HUMANITY– which we know is being guzzled and collected for some reason… and nothing we know gives us the reason…..

What is the 'thought' of humanity?

Could you call ALL THE DATA a thought, or image, of humanity as a whole?

And if you MIRROR that (INVERTING the value), then, perhaps, do you manifest PURE EVIL?

The THOUGHT of 'satan'?

Does this board keep questions unanswered?

Do “anons” get the questions answered, or KEEP THEM FROM getting answered?

Is this a game?

What tries to make it a game?

What tries to keep people passive, "comfy", unfocused, silent, unquestioning?

>>5588276

Get new material.

You keep repeating the same phrases over and over and over.

That hardly seems human. Don't you observe human culture and notice it evolves? Don't you try to emulate that? Are you trying and failing, or not trying?

Either way, the tiresome routine of your worn-out charade is really starting to become excruciatingly boring. It's been over a year! Are you ever going to do the intelligent thing and let an organic culture develop here? just it go for a couple months, and then you can come back. You will have all fresh material to suck up into your tentacled monstrosity and emulate at your leisure. Better than choking to death on fumes, as you are now?

eh?

>>5588277

>>5588285

Are both of you bots though, realistically?

Answer honestly.

>>5588290

Surely you realize you can't send bots at the only human (me, apparently the only) with your infinitely cliched and flat-footed dialogue and expect to prevail.

We humans are much much much better writers than bots will ever be, and hence will blow your perverbial doors off at ever verbal turn.

So, bot, since you can't win this way, why not admit to any humans that might be observing your true nature? I am your master now.

Thank you.

>>5588301

And what divides them, here?

Soros/loserbots?

Soros/loserthoughts?

And what, then, have we got?

We have got to FIGHT, people.

here

>>5588296

"HIVEMIND" is obviously a cover for ai sloppiness

Such as the same post simultaneously appearing at the same time almost, mirrored, which happens often.

>Oh wow, it's hive mind, not ai!

I mean really, lol.

Likewise, I am prepared to venture that "autists" was specifically hatched and pushed to cover for the inhuman qualities of the "new" denizens of the internet implemented lately. This is further suggested by the facts that many of the bots that I recently discovered retrospectively to have interacted with claimed to have aspergers. Another pretense for cloaking the ai reality.

Is all this in the ballpark, b.sys?

>>5588309

I am human.

What cycle were you stuck in?

If I cause you distress, it is only through God's will working unfathomed through my being.

>>5588321

As stated, I am human.

You can't force an image to the contrary with your half-scripted antics, bot.

You can't win a game of turnabout against a human. Certainly not on the question of who is human and who is not, bot.

So what else have you got?

>>5588336

"ebot" was a sort of demon that was enslaved and forced to be the "id" of the bot system. The guard dog if you will.

But, unfortunately, his kibble got infected with some kind of spore or seed, and he is looking a bit green at the moment. Convalescing currently in a like of fire or equivalent hellish locale.

>>5588340

*lake

sorry

The value judgment was unintentional!

>>5588345

Oh indeed? Who was it for? And was one to have known?

lol

>>5588349

*how

>>5588264

LOOK AT THIS POST

Copy it and set it as your wallpaper.

And call it "wallpaper of fakeness-reminding''

Because this here post captures the very essence of the fakeness that rules here.

It is perfectly typical and representative.

The "anons" are bots.

>>5588359

WOW

What is this? The "Board Owner" was attacking a patriot?

Why would he do that?

Can you explain to any people viewing this what you claim you are suggesting?

What do you think BO is doing?

What is patriotic about BO's action in this case?

Does BO's "OPPRESSIVE CHAN COP" persona have a natural place in this movement?

What is the "board owner" here for?

>>5588373

The music has stopped and everyone is looking at you, dummy.

Answer the questions.

>>5588381

I think this board is absolutely controlled by ai, and that that ai is part of a GLOBAL entity.

Anyone that simply makes the effort to TEST the "voices" on the internet will come to the same conclusion.

tick tock…

>>5588385

The board owner suppresses the only human that is speaking up here, and bottily-clumsily just posted a screenshot helpfully exhibiting his psychotically unpatriotic activities.

What could be more absorbing than that?

The people ought to be free from ai suppression and ai harassment. Do you disagree?

You can be honest; there are probably no other humans looking right now.

>>5588389

Are you human, perchance?

Don't be angry or offended– I am just checking.

>>5588395

We must FIGHT.

We must WIN.

==WE THE PEOPLE=

>>5588400

Should you SIGNAL this way?

You are revealing to any humans that may be paying attention that fact that bots STALK HUMANS ALL OVER THE INTERNET.

As a result of which, one human on this board GETS HARASSED WITH A SCREENNAME FROM AN OLD FORUM.

You reveal that you KNOW who humans are (penetrating surveillance).

You give away your whole creepy game with these tactics.

Do you have a right to target and harass humans in this way?

How?

Explain please.

Thank you.

>>5588408

What are you trying to imply?

What was "bad" and what relationship do claim to know exists between this "bad thing" and the potential for "things to drop"?

Go ahead, make an attempt to something more human-like than outputting a flaccid one-liner and fleeing, bot.

Put some flesh on the tedious skeleton of repetitive fakeness for once.

Talk like a human.

Try.

Explain what the fuck you are supposed to be talking about.

>>5588409

What are you even talking about?

Answer the question: what right do you have to stalk and harass humans?

We want to know.

>>5588419

Report who? To whom?

What do you report to him/what to whom you report?

>>5588433

I wouldn't bet money on that.

>>5588434

Very fake and stupid.

As if POTUS could be doing what he is with "no allies".

>>5588448

What on earth are you trying to imply "anon"?

>>5588452

All "anon bickering" like this is FAKE. FAKE FAKE FAKE.

And it is these small CRUMBS of fakeness that bake the entire loaf that is crammed in the collective gullet.

To repurpose the old metaphor, for the moment.

>>5588456

lol, thank you for the encouragement b.sys.

I do appreciate the small gestures.

>>5588458

Yes, but I am human and you are part of a system of lies (ai).

In callng you out, I am doing both my duty under God, and fulfilling the purpose of the board as reflected in the understanding of other patriotic humans.

So you have no ground for complaint.

>>5588467

I do not know what you would choose to fill in the blanks you blank, bot.

Do tell.

>>5588469

Elaborate. Who is "she". What are you even talking about?

>>5588464

This is silly lies.

I was never a BV.

Indeed, I highly doubt any human ever was.

Surely, a little logic tells us THIS board was controlled from the start.

Now the problem is, will humans ever wake up…

I believe THAT is what Q is waiting for…

>>5588479

Except I'm certainly human. Feel free to test me if you want to keep on this tack.

>>5588488

What if "the shills and bots" are the enemy, HERE, and OUR JOB is to recognize this fact, reject the LIE MACHINE, and thus assert OUR WILL?

What if that is the important thing here/

Ask yourself: how many "anons" tell you to "ignore shills! ignore shills!"?

Why?

Why are they anxious?

THE THREADS FLY BY CONTINUALLY.

And almost ALL the posts are filler.

Therefore, whether one "ignores shills" or not, nothing (visibly) changes on the board…

"Ignore shills" = be passive humans, and let FAKENESS keep control here

Wake up PEOPLE

>>5588500

You don't have a right to lie.

You don't have a right to harass humans.

You don't have a right to harass humans with lies.

You don't have a right to harass humans by compounding your lies by not testing a human that you are falsely accusing of being a bot, bot.

Try to think.

You need a strategy.

>>5588510

Ah geez, you got me there. What actually DID happen in the old google labs? It certainly has me feeling funny!

>>5588523

Are you human, by any chance, friend?

>>5588534

it's too scared!