>>560665

How did you get to be BV? What process is involved?

What is the vetting we did for BO?

>>560709

Getting rid of a compromised BV that is OBVIOUSLY a clown, probably a fucking BOT is not "D&C". Anyone can look at the stream of pointless nonsense filling up this thread, and BV's posts themselves, and see what is going on.

I am honestly amazed that it is done this easily and flagrantly, and there is no ability to counteract it, that I've seen.

How was BO vetted? What was the process?

>>560751

It's a very basic question, one which could easily put to rest any concerns with a proper answer.

>>560763

This certainly doesn't seem like a reasonable response.

I am sure some anon can give a quick and basic rundown of how it went down?

I am shocked that no other anons seem to even be noticing how much nonsense is being allowed.

>>560815

It is necessary to gain control of this board. Period. You can keep working in the meantime, but failing to address something so fundamental is pure folly.

>>560833

Stereotypical bot response confirm bot post.

If BO has looked all this over and signed off on BV, then I find it hard to believe he is not fishy as well, which is why I am asking how he was vetted.