Jonathan Swan tweet

Of course Nunberg is the witness who gave me the subpoena.He's made that very clear on TV today. He told me I could print contents without naming him; & I did so because a grand jury subpoena is objectively newsworthy. That Sam is doing reckless harm to himself is another matter.

twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/970808344217882624

>>560332

I'd like to think that Kim (or Assange) gave this exploit to Seth Rich to use in extracting materials from the DNC.

But it seems like it would still require access to the Outlook PST files, which Seth wouldn't have likely had.

So was he working with someone else?

Would give other reasons why they haven't revealed their source. Someone else is still in danger.

>>560479

Looks like more blame-casting.

Strzok is the fall guy.