>>558131
>Internet Bill of Rights is not the mission of this board.
>I do not support it.
>I do not need to support it to continue with this board and its mission.
>An internet bill of rights itself is restriction of the internet.
>>558234
>I agree
>>558255
>I'm not a big internet bill of rights…
>After all we have a great bill of rights, we just need to enforce it, and the RICO laws applied against Google, FB, Twitter etc.
>After all the ties to government by Google, etc is the definition of Fascism corp/gov partnerships,
>Is it any surprise these things accelerated under the 8 years of BHOe the man that followed Hitlers plan for socialization.
>>558307
>We should maintain that Government has NO control over the Internet. Not run to Government like children running to daddy cause the bad man said no.
>>558346
>Q never said to buy a SJW sweatshirt and act like a retard in the streets.
>The Q post on 01/25 asked this board to push and promote the reality of internet censorship and the damage it could do to the ALT Media into the normie's brains.
>Given the whopping success the #ReleaseTheMemo had, pushing #InternetBillOfRights in the same fashion seemed like a reasonable request
AT&T + Internet Bill of Rights = Power Play
"This is a clever play by AT&T aimed not at protecting users, but kneecapping edge providers like Facebook and Google." - Techcrunch
>I very much doubt AT&T cares about ((You)) and your privacy.
I'm really happy to see anons putting forth their arguments and opinions on such topics. I think it is really important for anons to do this because it functions as is a hedge against the powers of conformity and the rise of mob rule. So long as anons can re-frame from name calling (and like-wise from responding to such) then raising legitimate concerns should not be viewed so much as "conflict", but rather as "dialogue" (see David Bohm).
While I signed both petitions because I saw little harm in doing so, I must admit all of the issues raised above ran through my mind as well. It is NOT at all clear what this petition will accomplish going forward or what is at stake should it fail.
The topic of freedom of expression on the internet was made more complex with the passage of Net Neutrality and the way it was deceptively framed to the public by corporate lobbyists.
Some questions for anons to consider:
With Net Neutrality now out of the way, how are corporations like google, twitter, and facebook still in a position to censor information?
We already have a great bill of rights, so why does it NOT now apply where the internet is concerned?
What are the legal hurdles preventing the 1st amendment from being enforced where the internet is concerned?