anons
lawfag here
from the article in the Q post about the FOIA request and how it was answered
KEK! the DOJ answered truthfully with lawyerspeak -
here was the exact answer:
“when the Attorney General directed Mr. Huber to evaluate these matters, no written guidance or directives were issued to Mr. Huber in connection with this directive, either by the Attorney General, or by other senior leadership office staff.”
that is technically true - the letter contains no "written guidance or directives" - it does contain a REQUEST from Congress to Sessions which was then passed along to Huber - as the letter states:
"i have requested that you review the matter referenced in the enclosed letter…" and goes on to specify the scope of the REQUEST that he is PASSING ON to Huber to Huber without guidance or directives. So the answer was cagey and literal but NOT false.
LOL - shit works both ways folks - MSM spins - what goes around comes around - if they do its BOMBSHELL NEWS but if its not them its a LIE! KEK
sauce for FOIA quote - https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/it-exists-doj-finds-letter-ordering-scrutiny-of-uranium-one-hillary-clinton/ar-BBUzHJZ?ocid=st