>>5582989 (pb)

>>5583046 (pb)

I am beginning to STRONGLY suspect that Donna Zuckerberg is NOT who she appears to be, a ditzy blue-haired feminist, living off her brother's fame and money, and getting off researching "toxic masculinity". I think she might be deliberately playing that role to attract misguided attacks from the most intellectual faction of deplorables opposing the elites. I was certainly one of them until two days ago. What she is actually doing, I am not sure, but it might be quite sinister.

The more I dig, the more strangeness I find.

She MOST DEFINITELY signals that she is a member of an America-hating, goddess-worshiping cult. I say this as someone who until I found this myself had not really paid all that much attention to the cult-related stuff Q posts.

Look at her tweet. It quotes a line that occurs in an article in an online journal that she runs.:

https://medium.com/idle-musings/veteres-famae-bd150b4290f7

http://archive.is/m1jlF

The article needs a lot of decoding, since it is written as if it is a dialogue between ancient Romans discussing their political situation in an "online" venue, but it is obviously meant to be a commentary on current American politics. The line DZ quotes occurs in a paragraph that also includes the lines "Now there's all these extremist populares rambling about how they hate Rome and we shouldn't listen to Cicero. Especially one certain femina with the famous brother - she and her crowd of Magna Mater devotees are the problem." Rome is obviously America. And the "femina with the famous brother" is Donna Zuckerberg. And by deliberately pointing to this paragraph via twitter, she is insinuating to all who can read that she is part of "a crowd of Magna Mater devotees".

Magna Mater is Cybele, who had a mystery cult in the Roman empire, and was identified with various other goddesses, including Tanit, "face of Baal".

(At first I was wondering if Donna could seriously be Mark's CIA handler, but after I found this I am at a total loss. It is CRAZY.)