you don't need to keep reposting it.
Almost to the point of being spammed. SenateAnon isn't important. Whether it was a larp or not isn't important. There is only Q…..
ThankQ anon. One of my all time fav's.
Remember when it was cracked windows? Now (((they))) are using smoke.
notable
Let's not forget about the FBI not following thru with the multiple complaints against the shooter. Hold every last 1 accountable.
You are watching the destruction of the Dem party.
A House divided can not stand
Enjoy the show…kek
"Eyewitnesses" don't tend to be very credible. Not enough supporting claims, imo. If nothing else good comes out of it, at least some FL schools are getting armed guards. Broward is just so corrupt.
It's a slippery slope anon. Very slipper. But what if the school shooters had their guns taken due to red flag laws. Is that a bad thing? It could be a good law IF the proper protections (2A) were put in place and stringent wording on how it is used. Crazies with a gun (MKUltra).
Fix what? Look at what's in play here. Under the Dem umbreall is your 1. KKK, antifascist 2. socialist, globalist, climate change. 3. Muslims. 4. SJW's, LGBT, etc. Can you NOT see how they are all in direct conflict with each other. They can no longer be untied with so many competing agenda's. Their strength use to be in sticking up for each other no matter what. They aren't going to be able to do that anymore. Supporting one will offend another. Just sit back and watch them destroy each other. What Omar said about BHO is just the beginning. They may even be too busy hating each other to fight against us, kek. Settle in your mind their destruction is now assured and then enoy the show.
They are getting desperate, kek
Just playing devil's advocate here. Do not take this question as endorsement of red flag laws.
What if a demented liberal that is triggered by a hat picks up a gun one day and decides MAGA people should not live. TDS is real and dangerous. We have laws that criminals can not carry for a reason. Does a person need to committ a felony before he is restricted?
Again, devil's advocate here.
Do felons have the right to carry guns?
That's as it should be.
That's kind of my point. It's a really tricky area dealing with violent behavior. I do not think a blanket statement should apply to pro or anti gun laws. Sadly, it is way too easy for anti 2A to get into decision making processes. Therefore, in order to prevent "infringment" we have to allow for the violent ones to have guns until they are convicted.
As I stated earlier, it would greatly depend on the wording. But that doesn't mean any good wording couldn't later be amended to include "feelz".
There could be a case for red flag laws if the globalist who want to disarm us didn't corrupt everything. So we are left to insist on everyone having the right, even when someone clearly shouldn't.