>>5608238 lb
Totally. But that really wasn't the debate here. The debate is whether a mentally fucked up person should be allowed to carry a gun if they have managed to allude a criminal conviction.
How long is this slide going to last?
We think alike, anon. We could have sensible laws written where a person that shows a history of violent behavior but not been actually convicted of anything should not be allowed to carry. I could easily write up such law that would provide for proven history of violence. However, sadly, any such law could/would be amended in the future as an excuse to take law abiding citizens guns away. To prevent that, we are now forced to advocate for everyone to carry, even violent individuals.
Exactly, and ow do you stop those good laws from being amended to a gun grabbing law?
Exactly. That's why I say they are forcing us to take a stand on no red flag laws.
Law abiding citizens don't want violent persons carrying. Sucks that they have to screw up everything good.
This is totally my point. Actually it would work in practice if the gun grabbers would not use it to take our guns away.
You speak the truth.
>They need to hold cops to HIGHER standards not LOWER standards.
Doesn't that always seem to be the way of it? Look at Congress for example. Our govt is completely broken. It would take decades to undo the liberal laws passed in the last decade.
I agree with you that an upstanding citizen, over time, should get his gun rights back.
Enjoyed our discussion, but real life calls. God Bless fren.