I was reading through the Senate Anon posts, and he/she agreed. Gabbard is CFR (should be an automatic red flag), was/is a member of a religious cult, and the Democrats plan to use her if things get desperate enough
Lol, it's the same dude
For sure, and was probably molested as a child himself.
Yes, this is the most relevant point. It wasn't acknowledged, because they couldn't acknowledge it (it was classified and need-to-know)
The JQ is one of the best methods for exposing who is really on our side and who is acting
I'm still on the fence. But if Neil deGrasse Tyson tells me it's good too, then I guess there's no denying the scientific proof
I'm curious if this means we have to wait until November before we hear anything in regards to Podesta and Huma
That would certainly be a welcome surprise
I think he has "associates" who can't tell him things directly, but instead know what FOIA requests he should make
Trips confirm. Chuck is a cuck and Tom is /ourguy/