>>5613818

>Patriot JQ Truther anons "Shilling" Against Zionist Subversion of America=

>GOOD

No. No shilling is good. We're here to post current news of crimes and the collusion to commit them among the cabal. If a specific piece of evidence or narrative connected to it implicates Jews or Israel, we don't shy from posting it or noting it, and we're not censored from it. But we're not here to push any particular agenda or POV, and anyone posting one too much in a given bread is shilling.

Shilling works counter to free speech because it amounts to everyone yelling at each other rather than quietly contributing while not eating more than their share of bread. There are special topics threads for anons that want to devote more time to those topics, but to commandeer the General for it is to operate in bad faith, not to display the selflessness of a Patriot.

>>5613996

>Q has told us the shills deploying all methods to subvert this board are mossad

But he never said it was exclusively Mossad. This endless back-and-forth on this issue serves no good purpose, only eats bread and disrupts our work. Either that's your intention, or you should re-consider chilling tf out and contributing content, not diatribes.

We're not censored from posting the truth about criminals, even Jewish ones. Dig that and post it when it's either current or directly, newly relevant to a specific Q-related item. That's the only productive way to truly expose the truth you claim to want to expose.

I post this not necessarily to change your mind, but so that any newfags lurking can better understand the difference between useful posts and wastes/distractions. Anyone that wants to be counted among the former should follow the example of anons that receive positive feedback from their fellows and whose contributions are deemed noteworthy by anons and baker.

>>5614002

Hey thanks anon. We're citizen journalists, so I figure we also have to work out our own rules for how to do it. There will always be shilling, anywhere people gather to exchange ideas with intent to influence. We need to re-learn ways to detect and ignore it. I think that's a big part of our work here. I mean, cutting thru bullshit with meme warfare is what got us this far, we can adapt and bring that discernment to grass-roots journalism I think. So that we don't just out the current group of faggots enslaving us currently, but ensure they don't come back again. I'd like to hope so anyway.

>>5614272

I can call out mossad as much as I like.

Never said otherwise. Only said that to continue to do so in so tone-deaf, unproductive manner makes anons ignore your message. Shill behavior reads as non-credible here.

>Only a shill would disagree with an anon doing so.

I also never suggested you not call out Mossad, only that you post relevant, sauced content as a means to do so. To just name-call fellow anons is useless. Oldfags know that, some of us want to help newfags know it.