>>5618750 Q latest
>>5618942 PB
>Oh shit. Q says “drop truth to power”. Clowns kill JPB. They did it cause Q exposed the JPB/Snowden link!
Does this mean that Q dropped JPB name and then allowed him to be assassinated? If JPB was cooperating then why would Q dangle him as bait?I find this to be a dubious proposition.
>NSA and C_A are rival agencies. C_A was doing evil stuff and were concerned that NSA could monitor what they were doing.
>
>Snowden worked for the Clowns. They inserted him inside NSA to steal secrets and then release them to hurt their reputation and force them to shut down some surveillance programs. This partially blinded the NSA so the C_A could continue evil stuff and NSA couldn't monitor them.
Why though? if the premise is "They never thought she'd lose." and they would continue to be in control why bother destroying the NSA when she could just appoint an NSA director that would play ball?
If the premise is they never thought she would lose they destroyed their most powerful surveillance apparatus for no reason, a set of tools that had she won they would be using everyday.
Makes 0 sense. Only explanation is that this internal intelligence war stretched back further than we thought. Long before POTUS announced.
Also, Ask yourself this.
Are you ok with the NSA having a surveillance apparatus like this? Recording every call, email, transaction, illicit sexual encounters you have, movie you watch, websites you shop on, places you go, articles you read, what you eat, wear, how you literally walk, what files you have on your PC?
All of these are serious and extreme violations of the 4th amendment. We are supposed to be protected from this in america. Snowden exposed all of this, and now I'm supposed to hate him? Tell me why?
Now all of you go ahead accuse me of being a shill.
Not true, I've been discussing Podesta, Snowden, and Seth Rich since long before coming to 8chan and first seeing Q.
You don't see anything wrong with having the agency that was exposed as engaging in illegal surveillance activities telling us that the person whom exposed said activities is the enemy. Seems pretty suspicious to me.
Whistleblower, traitor, all the same as far as the governent, the NSA, and you are concerned huh?
whis·tle-blow·er
/ˈ(h)wisəl ˌblō(ə)r/
noun
noun: whistleblower
a person who informs on a person or organization engaged in an illicit activity.
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution -
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,[a] against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
So. Whether congress said it was ok or not, it goes against the supreme law of the land, therefore is illegal.
Snowden, unless you have evidence that he is guilty of something other than exposing the NSA, is a whistleblower not a traitor. Dumbass.