>>5619318 lb
one correction, I do believe it was admitted rogers' corrective actions that relocated NSA under Pentagon roof
1) crawl before walk. horse before cart. spell before pasta.
2) there was a shill a few weeks back that was wayyyy bigger dock than you…. he even convo'd about what he was doing while he was doing it. fuzz and all….
he was an actual threat, but courteous. you on other hand, not a threat but talks like balls of steel
not really…. if I recall Def
Reorganize act merely split 1 agency into 2: CIA and green Berets
imo you didn't hit a nerve by your questions illuminating some knowledge gap as you seem to be suggesting. it's more that these cats have all been nice enough to humor you with the answers they each arrived at in their own words, and none of it seems to further your inquiry to new questions…. tldr you are fake and gay while also leaving anons annoyed with your lack of reflexivity
no. your ability to understand his perception of Russian national interest in relation to such a scenario is lacking. it could easily make sense for him to say nothing to further his effectiveness as leader of a state that interacts with other states as they each pursue self-help in an anarchic system. BTFO and learn so IR theory
glad you asked. I'd like to know too… gun fact there is a random Corp office in Nola est. after Katrina
shit! RAND Corp fucking spellcheck
concernfagging will not affect us. before the interwebs there was and still is face to face human interactions, and something you may be to young to have known, it was called Civic culture, i.e. interaction with neighbors and the like irl. faggot
do ya one related… I dug on Cosmiq earlier… it's an INQtel thing. all partners have locales near DIA airport. what if they know to go underground and sat surveillance is being designed to know when surface is good to rehabilitate?
your question is no more important than my opinion as we are each arbiter of our possessions and remain satisfied with them in our grasp. you are missing the point, but since you like rhetorical questions…. what makes you think an accusation of espionage leveled at an agent acting in some capacity of their position is handled the same way as a citizen accused of sedition? Think about it I'll wait
dude the drop I did a few breads back…. I also came across this random ass story on top of everything else
https://www.stateofglobe.com/russian-satellite-destroys-nazi-ufo-over-colorado/sample-post/hans-super/
dipshit I'm not calling him a traitor. he may be but that takes a verdict doesn't it. obviously you didn't think through my rhetorical question but expect people to think through yours. that's a little lopsided don't ya think?
just to reveal the answer to the question I posted, if he was acting in capacity of a mission, we may never know whether he was traitor or not as that would place him under the heading of active national security threat until apprehended, if apprehension is doable otherwise it's bullets and shallow graves… no legacy, no sullied name with status of traitor adjacent
you have it seems never been a whistleblower.
but you forget Q speaks certainty from their authority. you are thereby appealing to authority pointing to them, instead of following instructions and looking into it for yourself
Saul and Ethel Rosenberg = actual found guilty of treachery traitors. Traitor = term used by Q to speak da English to anons… an approx synonym. a placeholder
and if you do follow protocol you better believe there are workarounds to reveal your ID to the accused, who is likely lateral or above you (in a position to make you and anyone else's life miserable they feel they need to for sake of example albeit, obliquely)
but that's where I see you in a loop. if it was in public purview how is it a leak, how would a jury find him guilty of treachery? I too am civil libertarian by nature. when he came forth, I knew he was legit spooky and the shit added up, as you say public purview. so he is not likely to be found guilty for the reveal to public per session, any litigation of the issue with a guilty verdict in mind (assuming not shallow grave scenario) would be built to prove he rendered ongoing sources and methods ineffective, and endangered the lives of those in the field and their humint sources as well. it would not be because he connected the dots for us that the USA Patriot Act was dragnet surveillance. on some level I felt I knew it and he merely confirmed
kek. I member Gurps. generic universal role playing system
don't let perfect be the enemy of the good. if there are worse monsters out there intending us harm and they stopped it (actually, not like if news cycle shit… the stuff we'd never know about.) then your terminology needs to be adjusted rather than demanding the explaination we give contort to those terms you adhere to
I dunno you are talking absolutes there like to new information would)d convince you… I used to think assange biggest asshole, his mission in life be damned and Snowden awesome Joe America doing the right thing. shits not so black or white in this world
Snowden was advocating people use that app for "muh secure"…. anyways I went with telegram so fuck it
really glad someone benefitted from my dick mode tutorial. was back to back slapping green text Travis, straight over to debating an immovable object with my crane style. if someone benefitted I can get off now. night guyz