>>5619822 PB

What evidence? That he turned over documents to the press and what else?

>>5619816 PB

He released it to the press, same as other Whistleblowers in the past Dumbass.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American_whistleblowers

>>5619825 PB

I never said the CIA was the good guys, just that the NSA was violating the constitution on the direction of a criminal congress. Idiot.

>>5619863 PB

The only people accusing him of being part of an intelligence operation is the group of people that were exposed.

Guess I hit a nerve, you guys seem so angry by my quesions.

>>5619497 pb

>>5619656 pb

>>5619792 pb

>>5619719 pb

>>5620040

Your opinion doesn't matter. My questions are rhetorical, we all know the NSA mass surveillance program was illegal, we all know that the only provable thing snowden did wrong at this point is easily classifiable as a whistleblower, unless there is evidence that Snowden gave how the system works and how to construct it he is guilty of nothing more than being a whistleblower who fled from a corrupt goverment after exposing said government.

Or is your contention that the Bush and Obama admins weren't corrupt?

>>5620040

>>5620225

In fact, the only "traitors" in this discussion are that violated their oaths to protect the constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. Whether they be NSA, FBI, CIA, or Elected Official.

The only one that defended his oath and is paying the price is the guy that Q is currently and previously accusing of being a traitor. If any evidence comes out to show Snowden did anything other I'll be the first to call him a traitor, but as of now I haven't seen anything, if it exist please sauce it.

>>5620246

Is snowden a citizen? Was the surveillance program legal when looked at through lense of constitutionality? Is there evidence that Snowden has done anything differently than Daniel Ellsberg that is contemporaneously considered to be a whistleblower and hero?

Snowden took an oath to defend the constitution, NSA was in violation of the constitution whether congress agreed or not. If government is doing something illegal exposing it isn't illegal, it is whistleblowing.

>>5620277

The people I accused of being upset over my questions did accuse him of being a traitor and so has Q which is how this entire discussion started. Dipshit.

>>5620304

You seem to have run out of points to make.

>>5620320

Q speaks for the agency that was found to have been violating the constitution. I'm here same as you because I believe in this movement and the people in it, that doesn't mean I think we should take everything Q says and never question anything about it. I think researchers should follow through to whatever the evidence the information points.

As of this moment the evidence points this direction.

Snowden leaked information to the public in a way that he new would reach the public in the way safest for his life and well being. Q is atleast in some part a government entity that seems to be pro-nsa, Q (pro-nas) says snowden is a traitor for exposing the NSA of violating the constitutional rights of 330million Americans give or take.

>>5620333

>Saul and Ethel Rosenberg

Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were Jewish American citizens who were convicted, with others, of conspiracy for espionage on behalf of the Soviet Union in the late 1940s

As of this moment there is 0 evidence that Snowden leaked anything to russia that wasn't in the public purview.

So, therefore your point is irrelevant.

>>5620403

How can the NSA be good if they are violating the constitutional rights of 330 million Americans?

Note - this doesn't mean the CIA is good.

>>5620441

>>5620442

>>5620444

>>5620422

Maybe Snowden is a traitor, maybe he isn't, I don't know for sure but of the typing of this post, he is a whistleblower and nothing more.

What I do know is that the John Podesta emails along with many other well known proofs lead me to believe that beyond a shadow of doubt the elites are molesting and murdering kids. What I do know is that the NSA has known about it for a very long time due to their mass surveillance and done nothing. I'm here because I think that they had to wait until Obama was out and Trump was in to act. That the intelligence community ran by the MI arm convinced Trump to run and they are protecting him and executing a takedown of these people. Maybe it will come out that Swonden was a part of the apparatus to protect the pedos and traffickers, but until some arrests are made, and I don't mean the arrest of the pedo down the street(they need to get them as well) but the pedos with (r) and (d) by their names on the nightly news.

Thats all I have to say. Good night Anons.