I second that. And your trips confirm.
There's a theory that these crashes are caused my the new MCAS system they introduced to cover some of the different handling characteristics of the Max. There's nothing fundamentally wrong with the plane, but if pilots jump in to a Max from an older 737 without the proper training they can get badly caught out by it.
That explains why these are newer planes that are crashing, just delivered and pilots not getting the proper training or just forgetting it under stress.
https://theaircurrent.com/aviation-safety/what-is-the-boeing-737-max-maneuvering-characteristics-augmentation-system-mcas-jt610/
Anyway, that could explain this one too.
Interesting. I mean, how long does it take to draft a 484 page bill? Does it look like it was carefully considered?
Shouldn't take too long, it's on dry ground in a fairly accessible location. The thing that struck me from the helicopter shot was how small the debris was, no engines and no tail. So it would have to have been under power going in to the ground. I think the voice recorder might be more revealing. The first officer seemed fairly new, 200 hours.
So I'm leaning towards the MCAS and maybe human factors with the captain and first officer interaction.
Snowden? Joshua Adam Schulte? (gets a serial killer name for some reason) Manning? Those guys know the operational security, Assange is just a glorified journalist.
BAKER
>>5621794, >>5621805, >>5621809 some Ethiopian Air crash victims named.
Wow. A smorgasbord of spoopiness in that lot. But to be expected the the region.
The stand outs for me are the child protection worker, and the underwater archeologist.
Terribly tragic of course, for the 99-100% of innocent victims, depending.
Child protection worker would fit then. But, damn, I really hope not. Please, God, let this be buggy code. Better Boeing loses 15% than people would be that sick and evil to pull something like that.
I think that anon is confusing socialism with communism. Properly organized Communism can work. You just need zero corruption, and you have to physically murder or expel all dissenters before you get going, but it can work, for a few decades anyway, kek.
Socialism is a slow stripping of wealth by the ruling elite from all strata in society, as you say. With socialism you don't need to do as much murdering, and it is basically built on corruption, so it tends to get going quicker, but doesn't last as long.
You only need to look at the longevity of systems to see which is better.
There were monarchies that lasted many hundreds of years, and so far capitalist democracies have lasted longer than any modern communal type system. It's a system that tolerates corruption, but doesn't depend on it to work.