I still trust David Wilcock.
He's basically preaching the existence of ETs, the veracity of Q, the importance of compassion, and asks us to keep a totally open mind. What is your problem, really?
Plus he never EVER speaks ill of anyone else (meanwhile Cabal agents can't help slagging others).
Did you watch the video in question?
I did.
He goes on and on and on attributing the material to Howe. He refers people to her video channel. I only subscribed to her because he referred me. Her videos are quite hard to watch though. Meanwhile, I thought they were long-standing friends. If she's pissed off that he used some images, it sounds a lot more like a misunderstanding to me. It's not like he claimed they were his. Though at the time I thought he was perhaps stealing too much of her thunder. I'm not surprised she'd be a bit pissed about that. But really, I'm sure they could work something else out int he name of truth. You sure she's really suing even?
Thanks. I'll check out her response.
I think David is a bit of a dork, but that ain't a crime. I'm a dork too.
Ok, I watched Linda's very distressed response video in which she accused Wilcock of copyright infringement. It's sad to me. I hope this doesn't mean David is a lost cause. I didn't think Linda was accurate when she said there was no link in David's broadcast. David does seem to be a bit out of touch sometimes. He doesn't exactly run a professionally produced "program" with teams of producers and lawyers. I will watch to see what comes of this. I hope they work it out between them.
The worst part is it doesn't sound like David even asked her about using the images. I find that bizarre.
Watching with interest. Everything is up in the air.
Nope I don't think I was that person. I did ask if anybody had even watched the original Wilcock video though. As I said, he repeats at length that it's Howe's material and to go over and view her channel.
One other thing I'll throw out there. Disclosed UFO documents, photos, stories, etc. are historically "public domain." I mean, if they're technically copyrighted, it ALL ends up being exchanged and copied and shared. That may not excuse a violation of the law, but can you imagine where UFOlogy would be at if we had to get copyright clearance every time a picture or video was shared?
UFOlogy is surely about sharing the truth as widely and freely as we share Q drops. I wonder if David was obtusely approaching it that way, and he just went too far.
It's a shame. Linda does seem really hurt by it.