I hope it means she is going to try to defend herself. That would make for a great show!
Still, the anon’s idea of a/c privilege could be valid but in light of what they did to Cohen, she’d better not count on it. Still, the all the prosecution has to do is to establish date ranges when no privilege could apply.
Shills trying to up their game by saying:
I like Q but, [long list of things that sound like concernfag]
You know it’s the Jews cause everything has already been proven [fake sauce]
Everything is a nothing burger because [fake sauce]
This is not a free speech board because [fake sauce]
Shills are upping their game because Q says real action is coming soon and the shill masters are in full panic mode.
Think logically, anons. Shills are trying harder to sound like real anons - but their crap still glows. If a post is a bit off, then it’s just a shill trying to camouflage themselves in anon speak.
Might make things stickier, as she could still be mandated to testify about things she knew before privilege applied. The problem comes when she claims that all knowledge of someone’s suspect behavior came later when privilege applied. Prosecution then will have to unpeal that claim to force her to admit prior knowledge and possible participation in said behavior.