it's really simple:

the bots are in the bread.

they demand that you pay them attention.

made up things are posted which are not factual.

they insist on their false narrative.

they do the automatic gainsaying: it's a no win argument.

they reveal themselves quickly.

why are they here?

who cares.

they are either here for training (don't reply to shills) or to spread false information (who 'P' is: i was accused of lying about what Q said last bread for saying that what the shill/bot posted was not what Q had said.)

Shillbot can repeat to you a 'backatcha' ccusation.

but Shillbot is unable to really know. Because it has bad information.

Who P was revealled to be?

I just worry that if someone isn't smart enough to go back trhough the Q drops that the informatin about that could be misused.

So I don't say because you need to go back and read it for yourself.

>>5622205

It was one of those 'oh shit' moments.

The debate about it had gone on for months.

I think it was either later Sept or early Oct?

but I would need to review my caps.

and for the one who asked elsewhere

"But I AM a real little boy"

>>5622236

That would be a Q style of doing it.

I should review.

but here is a funny point: all real Oldfags have to know.

that the bots or shills don't is rather hillarious.

and in the interests of making peace with people who maybe were falsely 'cused or are 'bait' for creeps (people playing a role to draw in haters) it's better if we don't tell the bots who P is.