No explanation needed. Fully with you and fully understand.
Holy shit anons… just holy shit.
Let me finish that sentence for you DonJ.
".. your life's work. But what I especially love is that he made you look like a complete pussy infront of your own wife that you felt so seething about that you were shaking as your head became purple. You're rich Jeb, you could have pulled mad puss and yet you went for political points. Sucka!"
Finally… finally an anon posts it. Well done anon. I hate saying this phrase but, keep digging, treasure ahead. Anyhow, good post, I will send my sister over to reward you for this glorious post.
BAKER
Review please for potential notable.
So to anons just to lay this out. This past week Corsi pressed lawsuit on Roger Stone. Now I don't know the ins and outs with the InfoWars shit in terms of drama as I find them all the same including their mini me minions like Jack P, Loomer, etc. However, I found this very interesting.
By the old message it shows that Stone is being shown to not be working with WL (if we go by their statements and his). So it doesn't appear to be a big deal but then Praying Mantis comes in and, for seemingly no apparently reason, he accuses WikiLeaks of (basically) being liars or basically shilling for Stone. When I originally was working on this op (much more but still piecing together so much data) I took saw Mantis' involvement as odd considering it makes WL look bad but also is doing so at the cost of Stone's statement that he didn't work with them. The question is why? Why does this matter to anything about Q research, protecting the country and POTUS from drama.
It hit me just now as I was going through this old op that Mantis is, in essence, protecting Corsi by this post by making WL look like hijacked thus breaking Stone's alibi. He offers no evidence, he offers no logical statement, he just randomly accuses WL of shilling while they simply do what they always do and have done and that is post data.
Now fast forward to recently. Q drops his post about a reminder not to trust certain people and groups who are bad actors, trying to divide, and working for who we all very easily determined to be the InfoWars fuckery in one way or another.
Immediately after that Q drop out comes Mantis and plays the "I agree with you but I do not think he was referring to this book release". Key word "think". So on this occasion he yet again randomly has an opinion which randomly falls to the side of something connected to Corsi. In the books case, Pamphlet was a Corsi hand to try to overtake and destroy/divide the Q movement while Jack P set up the story which was foiled by Q's setup.
So to lay this out more clearly. Here we have an individual discounting WL as shilling which ultimately makes Stone (Corsi recent lawsuit victim) look bad - he offers no evidence to substantiate statement. Then, a few weeks later the same individual spins a very obvious Q post which comes off to look like Q was not referring to a book that is connected to a guy who worked for Corsi. So twice, in the span of two weeks, he basically shills for Corsi in a subtle way that few would recognize. No real anon, no real patriot, no real American, and no individual who is truly apart of this group would ever support, shill for, be connected to or have anything but disdain for Corsi, Jones, Loomer, Jack P, Milo, Cernovich, Pamphlet or ANYONE with ANY connection to them given their history.
Conclusion - Praying Mantis is very clearly a Corsi finger. There you go you Twitter fags. You've been begging for us real anons to give you something to work with, there it is, eat it up and have fun. But you, yes you Trixie, I expect a BJ for my time. Now go away and go deal with that shit.
The person she is talking to is a journalist as well. A game journalist. Archiving all, more to come.
Not really. I think he/they just want to bring our attention to work that Barlow did where we may find a clue to piece a drop together. Reminds me a lot of that old journalist who "died" by "suicide" in MN about a year ago after looking into the foundation.
Makes me wonder if he is edging us to tie it all together and find commonality.